Table 1.
The sample characteristics by lifetime experience of homelessness (ever been homeless for ≥1 months vs. not) in 6649 ELSA participants.
| Never homeless for ≥1 months |
Ever homeless for ≥1 months |
P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N (%)a | N (%)a | ||
| No. of participants | 6542 (98·4) | 107 (1·6) | |
| Mean age, years (SD) | 63·3 (8·1) | 60·7 (7·4) | ≤0.001 |
| Sex | 0.71 | ||
| Men | 2938 (44·9) | 50 (46·7) | |
| Women | 3604 (55·1) | 57 (53·3) | |
| Married/living with a partner | ≤0.001 | ||
| Yes | 4893 (74·8) | 52 (48·6) | |
| No | 1649 (25·2) | 55 (51·4) | |
| Educationb | 0.89 | ||
| A-level or higher including university degree | 2781 (42·7) | 44 (41·5) | |
| GCSE/O-level or equivalent qualification | 2070 (31·7) | 36 (34·0) | |
| No qualifications | 1671 (25·6) | 26 (24·5) | |
| Total net non-pension household wealthb | ≤0.001 | ||
| Wealthiest tertile (≥£296,500) | 2358 (36·7) | 25 (23·8) | |
| Intermediate tertile (≥£139,850 to < £296,500) | 2173 (33·9) | 19 (18·1) | |
| Poorest tertile (<£139,850) | 1888 (29·4) | 61 (58·1) | |
| Father/main carer's occupation at age 14 years | 0.89 | ||
| Manager/professional/business owner/administrator | 2117 (32·5) | 35 (32·7) | |
| Trade/sales/care services | 2039 (31·3) | 34 (31·8) | |
| Plant worker/Casual jobs/Unemployed | 2134 (32·5) | 32 (29·9) | |
| Other including retiredc | 252 (3·7) | 6 (5·6) | |
| No. of books in the household at age 10 years | 0.24 | ||
| Enough to fill two or more bookcases (>100 books) | 1122 (17·2) | 22 (20·6) | |
| Enough to fill one bookcase (26–100 books) | 1933 (29·5) | 32 (29·9) | |
| Enough to fill one shelf (11–25 books) | 1571 (24·0) | 16 (14·9) | |
| None or very few (0–10 books) | 1630 (24·9) | 26 (24·3) | |
| Other including missingc | 286 (4·4) | 11 (10·3) |
ELSA, English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.
Unless otherwise stated, this denotes the number of participants in each category (with the respective percent in brackets).
Education and wealth data were available for 6628 and 6524 participants, respectively.
The other/missing category was not used in the calculation of the P value.