Skip to main content
. 2020 May-Jun;84-85:73–79. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2020.02.014

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(A) Tumour biodistribution quantification shows an increase in mean percentage Injected Dose per tumour weight (%ID/g) in mice injected with [111In]In-anti-ICAM-1 compared to [111In]In-mIgG2a. However, there was no significant difference in [111In]In-anti-ICAM-1 uptake in the irradiated tumours compared to the mock-treated control. (B) SPECT image VOI quantification of each xenograft tumour at each SPECT time-point of 24, 48 and 72 h shows an increase in [111In]In-anti-ICAM-1 compared to [111In]mIgG2a at each of the time-points. There was a small increase in signal at the 24 h time-point in untreated mice compared to irradiated mice. However, there was no difference in [111In]In-anti-ICAM-1 signal in the irradiated tumours compared to the mock-treated control ones in the other 2 time-points. (C) Representative MIP images from the 24 h SPECT imaging study (white dashed circles indicate tumours).