Gulgec et al. [210] |
Robust damage detection and localization of steel connections |
30,000 damaged and 30,000 healthy strain distribution matrices in 28 × 56 dimension |
Ye et al. [211] |
Concrete crack detection |
14,000 concrete crack images with 80 × 80 pixel resolutions obtained from a concrete beam test |
Xu et al. [131] |
Multi-type seismic damage identification and localization |
2400 images with 640 × 640 pixel resolution of concrete cracking, concrete spalling, rebar exposure, and rebar buckling |
Nahata et al. [193] |
Post-earthquake damage extent identification of buildings |
1200 RGB images with 224 × 224 × 3 pixel resolution |
Beckman et al. [167] |
Concrete spalling damage detection and quantification |
444 concrete spalling images with the resolution of 853 × 1440 pixels |
Jang et al. [157] |
Detection of micro and macro concrete cracks |
20,000 hybrid combining vision and infrared thermography of concrete crack and intact images with 224 × 224 pixel resolution |
Dung and Anh [33] |
Concrete crack detection, segmentation, and density evaluation |
A public dataset of 40,000 concrete crack 227 × 227 pixel images |
Zhang et al. [166] |
Real-time autonomous bolt loosening detection |
300 tight and loosened bolt images with 224 × 224 pixels |
Wang et al. [171,196] |
Spalling detection for historic masonry structures |
500 images with 500 × 500 pixel resolutions |
A vision-based [189] |
Crack detection of gusset plate welding in steel bridges |
12,896 images with 64 × 64 pixels of cracks and the same number of non-cracks |
Liu and Zhang [192] |
Image-driven low cycle fatigue-induced damage identification for post-hazard inspection |
8259 images with 224 × 224 pixels extracted from a the video was taken during the experimental test |
Ni et al. [198] |
Concrete thin crack identification and width measurement |
65,319 crack and 64,681 non-crack 224 × 224 RGB images for GoogleNet and 60,000 images for ResNet |
Hoskere et al. [140] |
Rapid and autonomous post-earthquake inspections including identification of damage presence and damage type |
A set of 665 images with 288 × 288 pixels containing post-earthquake damage scenarios such as concrete cracks, spalling and exposed rebar |
Chen [113] |
Inspection of nuclear power plants and detection of cracks in video frames |
A total 147,344 crack and 149,460 non-crack 120 × 120 image patches |
Liang [143] |
Post-disaster system-level failure analysis of bridges, the structural component-level identification, and local-level damage localization |
492 number of 224 × 224 RGB images |
Zhao et al. [202] |
Classification the types of bridges, recognition of bridge components and crack detection |
3832 RGB images of an arch, suspension and cable-stayed bridges with 227 × 227 pixel resolution and 60,000 intact and cracked concrete RGB images with 224 × 224 pixel resolution |
Gao et al. [142,212] |
Component type, spalling condition, damage level, and damage type determination. |
2000 images with a size of 224 × 224 RGB (Structural ImageNet) |
Dorafshan et al. [203] |
Autonomous inspection of concrete structures using Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) |
9011 227 × 227 pixel images of lab-made bridge decks including 1471 cracked and 7540 intact cases taken by Nikon camera |
Suh and Cha [204] |
Damage type detection and localization |
2366 images of concrete cracks, steel delimitation, corrosion, and bolt loosening with a size of 500 × 375 pixel |
Wang et al. [196] |
Damage type identification (intact, crack, efflorescence, and spall) and localization for masonry historic structures |
5145 stretcher and header brick images with 480 × 105 and 210 × 105 pixel resolutions respectively |
Kim et al. [72] |
Determining the existence and location of cracks from surface images considering crack-like noise patterns |
3186 images crack and intact surfaces with different distances between the camera and 227 × 227 pixel |
Silva et al. [213] |
Automated inspection of concrete structures and crack detection |
3500 sample of concrete surface images of 256 × 256 pixels with and without cracks |
Dorafshan et al. [96] |
Image-based crack detection in concrete structures |
18,000 concrete panel images with the size of 256 × 256 pixel simulating reinforced concrete bridge decks |
Sharma et al. [214] |
Image-based detection of the crack presence |
15,600 crack and non-crack 28 × 28 RGB image patches |
Li and Zhao [169] |
Crack detection of concrete surfaces |
real concrete surface RGB images with 224 × 224 pixel resolution and taken by a smartphone |
Kang and Cha [14] |
Autonomous UAV method using ultrasonic beacons for damage detection and localization |
40,000 cracked and intact concrete surface images with 256 × 256 pixel |
Yang et al. [101] |
Semantically identification and pixel-wise segmentation |
A collection of 800 images of various cracks with 224 × 224 pixel |
Kim and Cho [122] |
Crack detection on concrete surfaces |
7195 images of cracks, joints, edges, plants, and intact surfaces with 227 × 227 pixel scraped from the Internet |
Beckman et al. [205] |
Volumetric damage detection and quantification |
444 images of concrete spalling with the resolution of 853 × 1440 pixels |
Kumar et al. [215] |
Automated CCTV inspection of sewer pipelines |
12,000 images of cracks, root intrusions, deposits, and in pipelines with the dimension of 256 × 256 |
Narazaki et al. [144,190,199] |
Structural bridge components recognition |
39,081 images of a concrete girder bridge with a size of 240 × 320 |
Karaaslan et al. [186] |
Mixed reality inspection including detection and segmentation of cracks and spalls |
51,300 concrete crack, road damage and bridge inspection images with the size of 300 × 300 |
Oliveira et al. [216] |
Damage classification in an aluminum plate |
720 frames of 128 × 128 greyscale representation of electromechanical impedance |
Li et al. [217] |
Concrete bridge inspection and estimating the probability of being cracked |
326,000 samples of 18 × 18 one channel greyscale patches of concrete cracks and non-cracks |
An et al. [124] |
Autonomous detection of macro- and micro-cracks |
A set of 20,000 images of crack and intact images 227 × 227 RGB images |
Duarte et al. [163] |
Building damage (rubble piles, debris) classification and assessment from images such as |
A total of 12,973 of the satellite and airborne 224 × 224 pixel images |
Ji et al. [218] |
Identification of collapsed buildings from post-event satellite images |
613 collapsed and 1857 non-collapsed buildings Post-Earthquake Satellite images with the resolution of 96 × 96 |
Kang and Cha [159] |
Intact and cracked concrete area classification |
A broad variation of 2304 × 1280 raw images of concrete surfaces |
Modarres et al. [219] |
Crack detection of concrete bridges and composite panels |
2400 number of real concrete crack and intact surfaces and 6000 debonded and intact sandwich panels with a resolution of 96 × 96 pixel |
Yeum et al. [141] |
Classification and localization for visual assessment of connections in a full-scale truss structure |
100,000 images of welded joints with a dimension of 256 × 256 |
Hoskere [139] |
Damage localization and classification for post-earthquake structural assessment |
1695 images of concrete spalling, exposed rebar, steel corrosion, concrete cracks, fatigue cracks and asphalt cracks with a resolution of 288 × 288 |
Nazaraki et al. [191] |
Pixel-wise bridge component recognition |
11,897 urban, bridge and general 180 × 180 images |
Atha and Jahanshahi [31] |
Assessment and corrosion detection on metallic surfaces |
67,187 images of regions with and without corrosions with 128 × 128 pixel resolution |
Cha et al. [25] |
Automatic concrete crack detection |
40,000 images of cracks on concrete images with a dimension of 256 × 256 pixel |