Table 3.
Results from the post-assessment questionnaire about experiences during the intervention. Part 1 Statements reflecting degree of agreement to the statement scored from 1 to 5, 1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree, values are presented as median (Q1–3); Part 2 Present number of participants experiencing positive and/or negative subjective effects multiple answer possible, values are presented as n (%)
| Digital programn= 27 | Paper bookletn= 27 | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 | |||
| Feeling content with the programme | 5 (4–5) | 4 (3–5) | .026 |
| Programme was a support | 5 (4–5) | 4 (4–5)‡ | .044 |
| Programme was difficult to use | 1 (1–3) | 1 (1–3) | .606 |
| Programme contains challenging exercises | 4 (3–4) | 3.5 (3–5)† | .804 |
| Difficult to choose exercises at right level | 1 (1–4) | 3 (2–4)† | .050 |
| Worry about safety while practising | 1 (1–2)† | 1 (1–2) | .696 |
| Practice the same time of the day | 3 (2–4) | 2.5 (2–3)† | .798 |
| Difficult to find a place to do programme | 1 (1–2) | 1 (1–3)† | .169 |
| Prefer to work out hard | 3 (2–4) | 3 (3–4)† | .648 |
| Improved balance | 4 (3–5) | 4 (3–4)† | .109 |
| Increased leg-strength | 4 (3–5) | 3 (3–4)† | .032 |
| Part 2 | |||
| Positive effects | |||
| More energy/stamina | 13 (48) | 7 (26) | .091 |
| Improved mood | 3 (11) | 7 (26) | .161 |
| Improved well-being | 19 (70) | 13 (48) | .097 |
| Other | 3 (11) | 3 (11) | .284 |
| No, no positive effects | 0 | 7 (26) | .010F |
| Negative effects | |||
| Pain | 2 (7) | 5 (19) | .224 |
| Dizziness | 0 | 3 (11) | .075 |
| Stress | 1 (4) | 2 (7) | .552 |
| Tiredness / Fatigue | 1 (4) | 1 (4) | 1.0 |
| Other | 1 (4) | 2 (7) | .417 |
| No, no negative effects | 22 (82) | 16 (59) | .074 |
† 1 person missing
‡ 2 persons missing
F P-value for Fisher’s exact test