Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Oncol Nurs Forum. 2020 Jan 1;47(1):E13–E24. doi: 10.1188/20.ONF.E13-E24

TABLE 1.

Comparison of High-Risk Women Meeting Eligibility Criteria for BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing Who Participated in the Mental Health Substudy Versus Those Who Did Not

Participated in Substudy (N = 100)
Did Not Participate in Substudy (N = 267)
Characteristic X¯ SD X¯ SD p
Age (years) 60.65 11.79 58.13 11.05 0.06
Six-Point Scale score 8.76 4.69 9.15 4.27 0.45
Characteristic n % n % p
Education 0.03
High school or less 59 59 124 46
More than high school 41 41 143 54
Race/ethnicity 0.44
Hispanic 73 73 174 65
Non-Hispanic White 15 15 59 22
Non-Hispanic Black 8 8 25 9
Asian/other 4 4 9 4
Age at first live birth (years) 0.23
No live births or missing 14 14 45 17
Younger than 20 28 28 63 24
20–24 28 28 76 28
25–29 21 21 39 15
30 or older 9 9 44 16
Breast cancer risk perceptiona 0.01
Much higher 34 34 38 20
About the same 42 42 112 58
Much lower 23 23 42 22
First-degree relatives with breast cancerb 0.63
1 or more 51 52 116 55
0 or do not know 47 48 95 45
Blood relatives ever tested positive for a breast cancer gene mutation 0.11
Yes 12 12 49 18
No 63 63 142 53
Do not know 25 25 76 28
a

1 response was missing from the 100 participants who participated in the substudy, and 75 responses were missing from the 267 who did not participate in the substudy.

b

2 responses were missing from the 100 who participated in the substudy, and 56 responses were missing from the 267 who did not participate in the substudy.

Note. Because of rounding, percentages may not total 100.

Note. Missing data are because some participants chose not to respond.

Note. Scores greater than 6 on the Six-Point Scale warrant referral for genetic testing.