Table 3.
Determined Overall Quality of Studies Assessing Interventions Used in NH-ED Transitions of Care
Author, Year | Overall Quality |
---|---|
Terrell, 200522 | Fair. Only 31.9% of transfers during the intervention period utilized the transfer form. |
Hustey, 201024 | Fair. This study went to lengths to ensure blinding where possible. Experts in survey research reviewed surveys. Only 47% of transfers used the transfer form. |
Yeaman, 201525 | Poor. Descriptive statistical analyses utilized. |
Tsai, 201821 | Good. Qualitative interviews with NH nurses as well as iterative rounds of feedback from 50 experts in the field used to develop NHERT. |
Zamora, 201226 | Poor. Authors were required to implement a 1-month interventional strategy to “prime” the system (eg, calling NHs) due to the lack of online referrals. Only 22.7% of post-intervention transfers were accompanied by online referral. |
Carson, 201727 | Fair. Multiple PDSA cycles leave room for confounding effect. |
Tupper, 201528 | Fair. Evaluated “nonequivalent interventions and in conditions that do not allow for controlled research designs.” |
Kelly, 201220 | Fair. The authors faced issues with the design of their form and potential loss of the RTF in the formal medical record. |
Zafirau, 201223 | Fair. Less than 50% of transfers in intervention phase utilized transfer form. |
Dalawari, 201129 | Fair. There was a statistically significant difference in age, with the transfer form group having a mean age of approximately 4 years. |
Cwinn, 20097 | Good. No statistical difference between transfer form group and nontransfer form group regarding chief complaint. |
Abbreviations: ED, emergency department; NH, nursing home; NHERT, nursing home to emergency room transfer checklist; PDSA, plan-do-study-act cycle; RTF, resident transfer form.