Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 17;52(6):483–490. doi: 10.1055/a-1155-6229

Table 3. Suggested Research Agenda.

Infection and workflow/unit/staff
  • How to consider the lingering effects of COVID 19 during the coming months/years in our endoscopy practice?

  • When and how should a patient suspected of having COVID 19 be tested in relation to performance of a GI endoscopy procedure?

  • How often, or if at all,should medical staff/endoscopy staff be tested for COVID 19 and by which methods?

  • How did COVID-19 affect the endoscopy unit’s workflow?

  • How to take care of the psychological well-being of the GI endoscopy unit staff?

  • What are the financial consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak for the endoscopy unit?

  • How did COVID-19 affect fellows’ training, education, and research (meeting, e-learning, CME credits, collaborations, etc.)?

  • How to stimulate/compensate the staff to work extra hours to catch up with the patient waiting lists after the pandemic?

Procedural protection
  • Is there any difference in COVID 19 transmission risk between upper and lower GI endoscopy?

  • Is oral and/or fecal transmission a true/equal hazard?

  • Which are the fundamental PPEs that are required and how to confront their shortages?

  • What is the difference in using a FFP2 vs two surgical masks vs one surgical mask on infection risk?

Rescheduling and disease risk
  • What is the burden in terms of cancer progression of delaying GI endoscopy procedures due to the COVID-19 pandemic?

  • How did you organize the GI endoscopy care for patients?

  • How to prioritize postponed GI endoscopy procedures after the pandemic is over?

  • What are the “acceptable” waiting times, stratified by the type of GI endoscopy procedure?