Fig. 1. Subnetworks of the frontoparietal system.
a We hypothesized that the strength of the connection between the frontoparietal and default-mode systems can be tuned by altering the relative amplitudes of subnetworks within the frontoparietal system. b Community detection reveals two distinct frontoparietal subnetworks, which we show here projected onto the cortical surface. c We found that the activity of subnetwork (A) was positively correlated with the activity of the default-mode system (mean r = 0.042, p < 0.001, t(1206) = 20, 95% CI: [0.038, 0.046]), while the activity of subnetwork (B) was negatively correlated with the activity of the default-mode system (mean r = −0.082, p < 0.001, t(1206) = −27, 95% CI: [−0.088, −0.076]). d Using a simple regression model, we tested whether the strength of the functional connection between the default-mode and frontoparietal systems could be predicted by a linear combination of the activity of subnetwork (A) and the activity of subnetwork (B). Within this model, we found that an increase in subnetwork (A) activity corresponds to an increase in the strength of the functional connection between the frontoparietal and default-mode systems (estimate of regression coefficient β = 0.006535, 95% CI: (0.00519, 0.00788), p < 0.001, t(1204) = 9.54). e Conversely, within the same model, we found that an increase in subnetwork (B) activity corresponds to a decrease in the strength of the functional connection between the two systems (estimate of regression coefficient β = −0.0112, 95% CI: (−0.01273, −0.0097), p < 0.001, t(1204) = −14.3).