Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 9;7:70. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00070

Table 4.

Probiotic influence on markers of gastrointestinal barrier integrity in healthy adults.

References Pop.a Study design Probiotic manipulation/GI stressor Duration Measures and results
Exercise-induced GI injury
Carbuhn et al. (33) 16 female collegiate swimmers; age not reported DB, RCT; parallel B. longum 35624 1 x 109 CFU/d vs. placebo during intensified training period 6 weeks Inflammation: no differences
Plasma endotoxin: no differences
Gill et al. (69) 8 endurance trained male runners; 26 ± 6 years DB, RCT; crossover L. casei* (1011 CFU/d) vs. placebo/ 2 h run at 60% max intensity in a hot environment 7 days Plasma endotoxin (post-exercise): worsened w/ probiotic
Inflammation (post-exercise): no differences
Lamprecht et al. (64) 23 endurance trained men; 38 ± 4 years DB, RCT; parallel B. bifidum W23, B. lactis W51, E. faecium W54, L. acidophilus W22, L. brevis W63, L. lactis W58 (1010 CFU/day) vs. placebo/ 90 min intense cycling 14 weeks GI permeability (indirectly measured): improved w/ probiotic
Inflammation: 1 of 2 markers improved w/ probiotic
Roberts et al. (72) 20 recreationally active adults; 35 ± 2 years DB, RCT; parallel L. acidophilus CUL-60 (109 CFU/d), L. acidophilus CUL-21 (109 CFU/d), B. bifidum CUL-20 (9.5 x 109 CFU/d), B. animalis subsp lactis CUL-34 (5 x 108 CFU/d), 0.4 g FOS vs. placebo/ Long-distance triathlon 13 weeks Small intestinal permeability: improved w/ probiotic
Plasma endotoxin: improved w/ probiotic
Shing et al. (39) 10 male runners; 27 ± 2 years DB, RCT; crossover L. acidophilus (7 x 109 CFU/d), L. rhamnosus (16 x 109 CFU/d), L. casei (3 x 109 CFU/d), L. plantarum (3 x 109 CFU/d), L. fermentum (109 CFU/d), B. lactis (4 x 109 CFU/d), B. breve (109 CFU/d), B. bifidum (4.5 x 108 CFU/d), S. thermophilus (2 x 109 CFU/d) vs. placebo/ Run to fatigue at 80% max intensity in a hot environment 4 weeks Gastroduodenal permeability: no differences
Small intestinal permeability: no differences
Serum LPS: no differences
Inflammation: no differences
NSAID-induced GI injury
Endo et al. (84) 29 chronic aspirin and omeprazole users + iron deficiency anemia; 72 ± 7 years DB, RCT; parallel L. casei* (45 x 108 to 62 x 109 CFU/d) vs. placebo/ Chronic aspirin use 3 months Mucosal damage, small intestine: improved w/ probiotic
Gotteland et al. (85) 16 healthy adults; 23 ± 4 years DB, RCT; crossover L. rhamnosus GG (2.4 x 109 CFU/d), L. helveticus (2.4 x 109 CFU/d), L. acidophilus (2.4 x 109CFU/d) containing dairy product vs. same dairy product after heat treatment vs. no treatment/ Indomethacin ingestion 5 days Gastroduodenal permeability: improved w/ probiotic
Small intestinal permeability: no differences
Krumbeck et al. (76) 94 obese adults; 44 ± 11 years DB, RCT; parallel B adolescentis IVS-1 (109 CFU/d) vs. B. animalis subsp lactis BB-12 (109 CFU/d) vs. IVS-1+GOS vs. BB-12+GOS vs. GOS vs. lactose/ Aspirin ingestion 3 weeks GI permeability: no differences
Serum LPS: no differences

CFU, colony forming units; DB, double-blind; FOS, fructo-oligosaccharides; GI, gastrointestinal; GOS, galacto-oligosaccharide; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; RCT, randomized-controlled trial; w/ = with.

*

Strain not reported.

a

Mean ± SD and/or range.

B., Bifidobacterium; C., Clostridium; E., Enterococcus; L., Lactobacillus, S., Streptococcus.