Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Resuscitation. 2020 Feb 20;149:127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.040

Table 3:

Effect of rate calculation method on CPR quality classification status.

Effect of rate calculation method on CPR quality classification status
Rate Calculation Method
2-Second method1 3-Second Method1 Trimmed Mean Method1 All Methods2
Events (n=200)
Guideline-compliant status change 7 (3.5%) 10 (5.0%) 9 (4.5%) 14 (7.0%)
≥ 5 bpm difference 3 (1.5%) 4 (2.0%) 11 (5.5%) 15 (7.5%)
Epochs (n=1856)
Guideline-compliant status change 31 (1.7%) 49 (2.6%) 80 (4.3%) 114 (6.1%)
≥ 5 bpm difference 47 (2.5%) 56 (3.0%) 108 (5.8%) 162 (8.7%)
1

Reference method: Instantaneous rate with ≥ 1 sec pause (1-second method).

2

Denotes Guideline-compliant status change (top line) or average change ≥ 5 compressions per minute (bottom line) between any two of the calculation methods.