Skip to main content
. 2020 May 15;5(6):1996–2014. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00645

Table 3. Selected Studies on PS/PC CO2 Conversion.

PS
catalyst illumination conditions reactant/solution products QE (%) selectivity (%) formation rate normalized (mmol e gcat–1 h–1) maximum test time (h) ref.
Surface S and Br modified CoO/Co3O4 300 W Xe lamp, IR water filter, 500 mW cm–2 H2O CH4 2.3 at 405 nm 98 ∼80 9 (99)
CuIn5S8 single-unit-cell layers AM 1.5G filter, λ ≥ 400 nm, ∼50 mW cm–2 H2O CH4 0.79 100 0.0696 120 (100)
(Ag@Cr)/Ga2O3 400 W high-pressure mercury lamp with a quartz filter H2O CO   85.2 2.1 5 (101)
PC
catalyst illumination conditions reactant/solution products QE (%) selectivity (%) formation rate normalized (mmol e- gcat–1 h–1) or TON maximum test time (h) ref.
Co–Co2P@NPC 200 W white LED lamp TEOA/H2O/MeCN, [Ru(bpy)3]Cl2·6H2O CO   79.1 ∼70 18 (102)
RuP/C3N4 400 W Hg lamp, λ > 400 nm DMA/TEOA HCOOH 5.7 at 400 nm   TON > 1000   (103)
Iridium(III) complexes Blue LED light, 0.43 mW cm–2 TEOA/MeCN CO 10   TON > 265 10 days (104)