Skip to main content
. 2020 May 15;5(6):1996–2014. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00645

Table 4. Selected Studies on PEC CO2 Conversion.

Photocathode–Dark Anode
cathode anode illumination conditions electrolyte potential and current density products FE (%) SFE (%) maximum test time (h) ref
Bi Nanosheets Graphite 1 Sun NaHCO3 –1.1 V vs RHE, 18 mA cm–2 HCOOH ∼100 1.5 12 (105)
In0.4Bi0.6/MAPbI3 Pt 1 Sun KHCO3 –0.6 V vs RHE, ∼5.5 mA cm–2 HCOOH ∼100   1.5 (106)
TiO2-protected Cu2O–Re(tBu-bipy)(CO)3Cl Pt Xe lamp with KG 3 and AM 1.5 G filters Re(tBu-bipy)(CO)3Cl and MeOH –1.73 V vs Fc+/Fc, ∼1.5 mA cm–2 CO ∼100   5.5 (107)
Li-doped CuFeO2 Graphite 1 Sun pyridine acetate buffer –0.63 V vs SCE, ∼0.6 mA cm–2 CH3OH 96.7   1.5 (108)
CuFeO2/CuO Pt 1 Sun KHCO3 0.15 V vs RHE, ∼1.5 mA cm–2 HCOOH >90 1–1.2 7 days (109)
Photoanode–Dark Cathode
cathode anode illumination condition electrolyte potential and current density products FE (%) SFE (%) maximum test time (h) ref
Pd/C-coated Ti mesh GaAs/InGaP/TiO2/NiOx 1 Sun Anolyte: KOH; catholyte: KHCO3 Cathode: ∼−0.8 V vs Ag/AgCl, 8.5 mA cm–2 HCOOH >94 ∼10 3 (9)