Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 16;20:163. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01843-2

Table 1.

Summary of 16S rRNA gene sequencing analyses comparing paired swabs and tissue biopsies from 20 diabetic foot ulcerss

Parameter Swabs
Means (±s.d.)
Tissue
Means (±s.d.)
w/t value1 p value
No. of reads a 32,014(±16,068) 15,256(±16,699) − 162 0.001*
dAbundance b 564.7(±566.9) 266.5(±535.5) − 108 0.03*
16S/18S ratio 0.201(±0.35) 1.06(±1.08) 150 0.004*
Bacterial richnessc 25.1 (±8.2) 38(±11.7) 4.423 0.0003*
Shannon’s diversity 1.8(±0.58) 2.4(±0.78) 2.921 0.009*
dStaphylococcus spp. 49.3(±58.2) 14.4(±19.3) − 158 < 0.001*
dStreptococcus spp. 32.6(±39.3) 12.9(±37.9) − 131 0.003*
dEnterococcus spp. 7.3 (±8.0) 9.2(±22.4) − 57 0.224
dCorynebacterium spp. 42.9(±35.8) 18.3 (±20.0) − 128 0.015*
dEnterobacteriaceae 49.3 (±49.1) 24.7(±35.5) − 120 0.024*
dPseudomonas spp. 11.8(±26.9) 16.6(±38.5) 8 0.776
dAnaerococcus spp. 39.1(±35.9) 17(±26.1) − 132 0.012*
dFinegoldia spp. 20.8(±15.6) 17.8(±22.4) −32 0.535

1 As most of the data analysed was nonparametric, Wilcoxin signed rank tests were used except for bacterial richness and Shannon’s diversity data which were subject to paired t-test analyses

a reads in filtered OTU table (> 0.05%)

b no. of copies of 16S rRNA gene/μl

c Bacterial richness rarefied to 1500 reads

d square root transformed data

* Significant results (p < 0.05)