Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jan;44(1):22–30. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1705-y

Table 4.

Subgroup analysis comparing the patients with FB-SPGR performed before UTE (69 patients) to those with FB-SPGR performed after UTE (15 patients)

Assessment Features FB-SPGR mean scores
p values UTE mean scores p values
Before UTE After UTE Before FB-SPGR After FB-SPGR
Image quality Perceived SNR 3.4 3.1 0.0109 3.7 3.5 0.6487
Contrast 3.8 3.3 0.0012 3.3 2.9 0.0666
Artifacts 3.1 2.6 0.0022 3.6 3.4 0.0669
Blurring 2.7 2.6 0.3755 3.2 3.1 0.5761
Anatomic delineation Appendix 2.9 2.4 0.0292 3.2 3.0 0.5277
Small bowel 2.8 2.3 0.0156 3.1 2.9 0.1935
Colon 3.4 2.7 0.0003 3.6 3.5 0.7751
Bladder 3.8 3.2 0.0010 3.8 3.7 0.3867
Diagnostic confidence 3.7 3.1 0.0288 4.1 4.0 0.4289

Italics denote statistical significance after a Bonferroni–Holm multiple comparisons correction