Table 4:

Results from Multivariable Logistic Regression Model with Interaction Term Exploring How Gender Affirmation Moderates the Relationship Between Anticipated Stigma and Delayed/Non-Use of Healthcare in the Last 6 Months Among Black Transgender and Gender Diverse Youth in the United States (n=110)

	OR	95% CI	p-value
Gender affirmation	2.88	0.33,25.19	0.339
Anticipated stigma	7.48	1.60,35.00	0.011*
Gender affirmation x Anticipated stigma	0.13	0.02,0.68	0.016*
Enacted stigma	0.42	0.15,1.16	0.092
Age	1.03	0.79,1.35	0.813
High school education	1.55	0.32,7.60	0.588
Gender identity
Trans-feminine	referent
Trans-masculine	3.50	0.59,20.78	0.169
Gender diverse	1.95	0.53,7.14	0.315
Systematic vulnerability	0.90	0.53,1.54	0.695
Health coverage	0.50	0.12,2.01	0.328
HIV status	0.72	0.22,2.39	0.597
Depressive symptomatology	3.19	0.95,10.67	0.060

^*p<0.05

OR = Odds Ratio; 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval