Table 2.
Authors | Study Design | Quality Rating | Population | Outcome Measure | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noehren et al.16 | Prospective Case Control | Moderate | n = 36 females (18 with ITBS and 18 uninjured controls matched for gender, age, and mileage) | - Motion analysis with force plate | Group with history of ITBS exhibited increased hip adduction, hip abductor weakness, and increased knee internal rotation. |
Hamillet al.17 | Prospective Case Control | Moderate | n = 34 females (17 with ITBS and 17 uninjured controls with average mileage of 20 per week | - Motion analysis with force plate | |
Hein et al.18 | Prospective Case Control | Moderate | n = 36 (18 females with ITBS and 18 healthy female controls) | - Barefoot running on foam runway using a 6-camera infrared system | Although there was not a statistical significance, runners with ITBS exhibited more inconsistency with joint coupling during the first half of the stance phase. |
ITB strain, impingement, and symmetry indexes were determined and strain rate may be a predictive factor of ITBS.
ITBS = iliotibial band syndrome