Table 3.
The results of network centrality.
| City | Out-degree | In-degree | Betweenness | In-Closeness | Out-Closeness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chongqing | 15 | 15 | 3.63 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Chengdu | 15 | 12 | 1.25 | 83.33 | 100.00 |
| Zigong | 15 | 12 | 3.06 | 83.33 | 100.00 |
| Luzhou | 14 | 15 | 2.93 | 100.00 | 93.75 |
| Deyang | 15 | 13 | 1.91 | 88.24 | 100.00 |
| Mianyang | 14 | 12 | 2.00 | 83.33 | 93.75 |
| Suining | 12 | 12 | 1.04 | 83.33 | 83.33 |
| Neijiang | 14 | 10 | 0.69 | 75.00 | 93.75 |
| Leshan | 10 | 13 | 0.65 | 88.24 | 75.00 |
| Nanchong | 15 | 13 | 2.27 | 88.24 | 100.00 |
| Meishan | 8 | 15 | 0.76 | 100.00 | 68.18 |
| Yibin | 10 | 15 | 1.38 | 100.00 | 75.00 |
| Guang’an | 13 | 15 | 2.81 | 100.00 | 88.24 |
| Dazhou | 15 | 10 | 0.83 | 75.00 | 100.00 |
| Ya’an | 12 | 14 | 2.26 | 93.75 | 83.33 |
| Ziyang | 13 | 14 | 2.54 | 93.75 | 88.24 |