Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 16;10(11):5015–5033. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6255

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

A conceptual model of relationships among intraspecific trait variation (functional diversity; iFDCV), abiotic within‐habitat heterogeneity (HD), and genetic diversity (GD) in T. montanum. HD influenced iFDCV twice as much as GD symbolized by different circle sizes and arrow strengths. Results and percents are extracted from the multiple linear regression model (Radj2 = .77, F 2, 10 = 21.66, p < .001). HD can lead to (reversible) short‐term responses, that is, to modification of functional trait expression (phenotypic modifications, variation). In contrast, GD is controlled by selection and is a prerequisite for adaptation through natural selection. iFDCV thus also depends on the available genetic variation within a population. Habitat heterogeneity and genetic diversity are not significantly related in this study (R = .10, F 1, 11 = 2.37, p = .15; dashed line)