Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 14;27(4):631–641. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01057-4

Table 3.

Univariate analysis

Univariate analysis
B SE HR (95% CI upper, lower) p value
Age
 Per year, continuous 0.012 0.006 1.012 1.000, 1.023 0.044
  < 60 vs. ≥ 60 0.317 0.124 1.373 1.077, 1.750 0.011
  < 70 vs. ≥ 70 0.745 0.183 2.107 1.471, 3.019 < 0.001
Menopausal status
 Pre- vs. post-menopause 0.041 0.127 1.042 0.812, 1.337 0.746
T stage
 T1 vs. T2-4 0.950 0.162 2.586 1.884, 3.552 < 0.001
N sage
 N0 vs. N1-3 0.893 0.125 2.444 1.912, 3.123 < 0.001
Pathological tumor size
 ≤ 1 cm vs. > 1 cm 0.383 0.142 1.467 1.110, 1.938 0.007
Pathological lymph node metastasis
 0 vs. 1–3 lymph nodes involved 0.429 0.145 1.536 1.156, 2.043 0.003
 0 vs. ≥ 4 lymph nodes involved 1.152 0.149 3.164 2.365, 4.233 < 0.001
 pN0 vs. pN +  0.715 0.121 2.044 1.611, 2.594 < 0.001
Grade
 Grade 1 vs. 2 − 0.085 0.224 0.918 0.592, 1.424 0.703
 Grade 1 vs. 3 − 0.036 0.213 0.964 0.635 0.865
ER status
 Negative vs. positive − 0.104 0.123 0.901 0.708, 1.146 0.396
HER2 status
 IHC 3 + vs. 2 + FISH +  − 0.023 0.180 0.977 0.687, 1.389 0.896
 IHC 3 + vs. FISH +  0.321 0.360 1.378 0.681, 2.790 0.373
Surgery (type)
 Partial vs. total mastectomy 0.486 0.123 1.626 1.278, 2.070 < 0.001
Preoperative systemic therapy
 No vs. Yes 0.409 0.122 1.505 1.185, 1.912 0.001
 CTx concurrent with TZM vs. sequential 0.196 0.425 1.217 0.529, 2.802 0.644
 CTx concurrent with TZM vs. without CTx − 9.998 230.841 0.000 0.000, inf 0.965
Postoperative systemic therapy
 No vs. yes − 1.956 0.504 0.141 0.053, 0.380 < 0.001
 CTx concurrent with TZM vs. sequential − 0.006 0.182 0.994 0.696, 1.419 0.974
 CTx concurrent with TZM vs. without CTx 0.472 0.176 1.604 1.136, 2.263 0.007
Chemotherapy
 No vs. yes (pre and/or postoperative) − 0.380 0.206 0.684 0.457, .025 0.066

B regression coefficient, SE regression coefficient of regression coefficient, HR hazard ratio; 95% CI 95% confidence interval