Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 10;11:875. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00875

Table 2.

Validation of previously published prognostic biomarkers for LIHC in OSlihc.

Gene symbol Biomarker name Clinical survival terms In OSlihc In reference Prognostic outcome (higher expression) Ref.
Cut-off p value HR 95%CI Case Cut-off p value case Detection level Validation
SPP1 Osteopontin (OPN) OS Upper 25% 0 2.3521 1.6394-3.3747 361 / <0.05 110 serum Yes, serum biochemical assay worse (Yang et al., 2008; Jin et al., 2014; Qin, 2014)
DSS 0.0126 1.8422 1.1403-2.9763 /
DFI 0.0183 1.5 1.071-2.1008 DFS: p < 0.05
PFI 0.0078 1.5611 1.1242-2.1679 /
BIRC5 Survivin OS Upper 25% 4e-04 1.9443 1.3457-2.8093 361 upper n = 31/lower n = 41 / 72 protein Yes, IHC assay worse (Fields et al., 2004)
DSS 2e-04 2.4062 1.5199-3.8095 /
DFI 9e-04 1.753 1.2585-2.4419 DFS: 0.0098
PFI 0.0012 1.7165 1.2375-2.3809 /
MKI67 Ki-67 OS Upper 25% 6e-04 1.9063 1.3174-2.7586 361 upper n = 47/lower n = 0 0.0009 67 protein (Ki-67 labeling index >10% indicated poor prognosis) Yes, IHC assay worse (King et al., 1998)
DSS 0.0011 2.1783 1.3664-3.4729 /
DFI 0.002 1.6821 1.2089-2.3404 DFS: 0.02
PFI 0.0027 1.6475 1.1891-2.2827 /