Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 10;11:1303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01303

TABLE 3.

Hierarchical regression analysis predicting self-acceptance.

Predictors ΔR2 ß t CI (95%)
Step 1: Demographics 0.02
Age 0.05 0.84 [−0.06, 0.15]
Gender 0.10 1.90 [−0.01, 0.38]
Marital status –0.04 –0.65 [−0.32, 0.16]
Step 2: Objective SES measures 0.04**
Age 0.04 0.79 [−0.07, 0.15]
Gender 0.08 1.60 [−0.04, 0.35]
Marital status 0.00 0.08 [−0.23, 0.25]
Income 0.15** 2.49 [0.03, 0.26]
Education –0.01 –0.23 [−0.13, 0.10]
Occupation 0.11 1.77 [−0.01, 0.23]
Step 3: MacArthur SSS scale 0.08***
Age 0.02 0.34 [−0.09, 0.12]
Gender 0.07 1.32 [−0.06, 0.31]
Marital status 0.01 0.24 [−0.20, 0.26]
Income 0.07 1.31 [−0.04, 0.19]
Education –0.02 –0.38 [−0.13, 0.09]
Occupation 0.07 1.19 [−0.05, 0.19]
MacArthur SSS scale 0.30*** 5.63 [0.20, 0.40]
Step 4: New social ladders 0.02**
Age 0.02 0.34 [−0.09, 0.12]
Gender 0.05 1.07 [−0.08, 0.28]
Marital status 0.02 0.29 [−0.20, 0.26]
Income 0.05 0.90 [−0.06, 0.17]
Education –0.05 –0.85 [−0.18, 0.07]
Occupation 0.02 0.35 [−0.10, 0.14]
MacArthur SSS scale 0.19** 2.79 [0.06, 0.32]
Income ladder 0.02 0.31 [−0.12, 0.16]
Education ladder 0.09 1.45 [−0.03, 0.22]
Occupation ladder 0.16** 2.34 [0.03, 0.29]

N = 368; SES, Socioeconomic Status; SSS, Subjective Socioeconomic Status; Gender (1 = females, 2 = males); Marital Status (1 = involved in a romantic relationship, 2 = non-involved in a relationship). Standardized regression coefficients are reported. All VIFs ≤ 1.96. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.