Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 10;11:1303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01303

TABLE 4.

Hierarchical regression analysis predicting positive relationships.

Predictors ΔR2 ß t CI (95%)
Step 1: Demographics 0.01
Age –0.09 –1.63 [−0.20, 0.02]
Gender –0.04 –0.66 [−0.26, 0.13]
Marital status 0.05 0.86 [−0.13, 0.34]
Step 2: Objective SES measures 0.06***
Age –0.06 –1.04 [−0.16, 0.05]
Gender –0.05 –1.03 [−0.29, 0.09]
Marital status 0.05 0.97 [−0.12, 0.36]
Income 0.12* 2.02 [0.00, 0.23]
Education 0.20** 3.41 [0.08, 0.31]
Occupation –0.04 –0.58 [−0.15, 0.08]
Step 3: MacArthur SSS scale 0.02*
Age –0.07 –1.24 [−0.18, 0.04]
Gender –0.06 –1.18 [−0.30, 0.08]
Marital status 0.06 1.04 [−0.11, 0.36]
Income 0.09 1.47 [−0.03, 0.20]
Education 0.19** 3.37 [0.08, 0.31]
Occupation –0.05 –0.85 [−0.17, 0.07]
MacArthur SSS scale 0.13* 2.38 [0.02, 0.24]
Step 4: New social ladders 0.02
Age –0.06 –1.03 [−0.17, 0.05]
Gender –0.07 –1.34 [−0.32, 0.06]
Marital status 0.05 0.98 [−0.12, 0.36]
Income 0.07 1.25 [−0.04, 0.19]
Education 0.14* 2.08 [0.01, 0.27]
Occupation –0.08 –1.22 [−0.20, 0.05]
MacArthur SSS scale 0.05 0.76 [−0.09, 0.19]
Income ladder 0.00 0.03 [−0.14, 0.14]
Education ladder 0.13* 2.01 [0.00, 0.26]
Occupation ladder 0.08 1.13 [−0.06, 0.22]

N = 368; SES, Socioeconomic Status; SSS, Subjective Socioeconomic Status; Gender (1 = females, 2 = males); Marital Status (1 = involved in a romantic relationship, 2 = non-involved in a relationship). Standardized regression coefficients are reported. All VIFs ≤ 1.96. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.