Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 18;11(6):304–318. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i6.304

Table 4.

Largest clinical studies published in 2015-2019 and their outcomes with distraction osteogenesis techniques

Ref. Number of patients Fixation type / bone union rate Problems requiring reoperations after frame removal or failures
Defects of tibia
Kinik et al[14], 2019, Turkey 30 Ilizarov/96.66% 1 nonunion, 1 refracture of the regenerate, 1 late deformity of the regenerate
Fahad et al[15], 2019, Pakistan 51 Ilizarov/96% 2 nonunions (1 amputation due to sepsis), 2 reinfections eradicated during main treatment
Thakeb et al[16], 2019, Egypt 50 Ilizarov/100%
Catagni et al[17], 2019, Italy 86 Ilizarov/100% 4 refractures
Wu et al[18], 2018, China 40 Ilizarov/100%
Yilihamu et al[19], 2017, China 129 Ilizarov + Orthofix/100%
McNally et al[20], 2017, United Kingdom 79 Ilizarov/86.1% 2 refractures, recurrence of infection, 6 after-frame reoperations
El-Alfy et al[21], 2017, Egypt 28 Ilizarov/100%
Meleppuram et al[22], 2016, India 42 Ilizarov/100%
Abuomira et al[23], 2016, Italy 55 Ilizarov + Taylor spatial frame/89% 1 osteitis, 2 bending of regenerate, 2 refractures of the docking site, 1 nonunion
Rohilla et al[24], 2016, India 70 Ilizarov vs rail fixator/77% vs 80% of primary union The rail fixator was converted to a ring fixator in two patients, 2 after-frame refractures
Sadek et al[25], 2016, Egypt 30 Ilizarov vs two stage internal osteosynthesis 1 nonunion in internal group
Bernstein et al[26], 2015, United States 30 Ilizarov/77% -
Peng et al[27], 2015, China 58 Ilizarov/100% 4 equinovarus deformities, 1 infection recurrence at the docking site
Defects due to acute fractures
van Niekerk et al[28], 2017, South Africa 24 Ilizarov/91.7% 2 amputations, 1 persistent deep infection in a HIV-positive patient, mangled extremity
Salih et al[29], 2018, United Kingdom 31 Ilizarov/96% 4 after-frame refractures, 2 regenerate deformities after frame, 1 stiff non-union
Fuermitz et al[30], 2016, Germany 25 Ilizarov or hybrid/92% 2 amputations due to comorbidities
Azzam et al[31], 2016, Еgypt 30 Ilizarov/93.3% 1 post-frame fracture
Thakeb et al[32], 2016, Egypt 161 Ilizarov 1 failure
Ajmera et al[33], 2015, India 30 Monolateral/93% 2 nonunions
Large-scale defects requiring tibilization of the fibula
Meselhy et al[34], 2018, Egypt 141 Ilizarov/100%
Zaman et al[35], 2017, Pakistan 121 Ilizarov/100% 1 supracondylar femoral fracture while removing frame
Defect of femur
Bakhsh et al[36], 2019, Pakistan 50 Ilizarov/98% 2 nonunions, 1 refracture
Zhang et al[37], 2017, China 41 Monolateral/98% 1 refracture, 5 cases of docking site nonunion
Mudiganty et al[38], 2017, India 22 Monolateral rail/97.5%
Agrawal et al[39], 2016, India 30 Monorail/100% 5 delayed union with autograft
Defects of femur and tibia
Ariyawatkul et al[40], 2019, Thailand 171 Ilizarov/94% 1 nonunion
Lowenberg et al[41], 2015, United States 127 Ilizatov/96% 3 amputations due to comorbidities
Yin et al[42], 2015, China 110 Ilizarov for tibia, monolateral for femur/100% 2 after-frame refractures
Tumor- resection defects
Eralp et al[43], 2016 (Turkey, United States, Egypt) 20 Various types of external fixators/100% 1 knee arthrodesis
Wang et al[44], 2019, China 101 Monolateral/90% 1 amputation at long-term due to cancer relapse
1

Smaller groups for rare conditions treated with the Ilizarov method (severely comminuted fractures, pan tibial defects, large periarticular defects). HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus.