Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 17.
Published in final edited form as: Cognition. 2018 Apr 26;177:198–213. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.011

Appendix 1b.

Exploratory factor analysis on the data from the visual SL task in Experiment 3, condition 2. Included here are loadings of all trials on the main three extracted factors. Numbers under ‘target’ and ‘foil’ correspond to the presented stimuli in Table 3 above.

serial trial no. target word foil factor 1 loading factor 2 loading factor 3 loading
1 1 1 .001 .396 .069
2 1 2 −.287 .538 .212
3 1 3 −.262 .213 .385
4 1 4 .043 .151 .313
5 1 5 .238 .282 .109
6 1 6 .463 −.482 .053
7 2 1 .365 .414 −.037
8 2 2 .220 .046 .517
9 2 3 .341 .143 .266
10 2 4 .450 −.038 .362
11 2 5 .587 −.248 .096
12 2 6 .557 −.068 .228
13 3 1 .486 .106 .025
14 3 2 .411 −.009 −.084
15 3 3 .356 −.259 .136
16 3 4 .315 −.417 .439
17 3 5 .241 .010 −.028
18 3 6 .447 −.342 −.221
19 4 1 .057 .365 −.112
20 4 2 .108 .322 −.415
21 4 3 .234 −.273 −.359
22 4 4 .248 .261 .281
23 4 5 .168 .095 −.160
24 4 6 .420 −.346 −.214
25 5 1 .138 .284 −.532
26 5 2 .191 .515 −.192
27 5 3 .355 .124 −.216
28 5 4 .400 .444 −.077
29 5 5 .550 .167 −.333
30 5 6 .335 −.002 −.469
31 6 1 .413 .281 .007
32 6 2 .396 .411 .297
33 6 3 .428 .112 .402
34 6 4 .624 −.152 .045
35 6 5 .541 .284 .011
36 6 6 .704 −.123 −.120
overall % of explained variance 14.6% 8.1% 7.1%