Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 16;20:295. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01580-4

Table 2.

The relationship between the level of LP-PLA2 and seriousness of clinical Presentation

Group Control SA UA AMI P
N 294 192 330 240
Age (years) 60.63 ± 11.96 66.00 ± 13.66 64.80 ± 10.99 62.05 ± 11.58 0.130
Male(%) 204 (69.4) 150 (78.1) 252 (76.4) 186 (77.5) 0.762
Smoking(%) 84 (28.6) 66 (34.3) 138 (41.8) 108 (45) 0.362
Hypertension(%) 168 (57.1) 120 (62.5) 252 (76.4) 120 (50) 0.051
Diabetes (%) 54 (18.4) 60 (31.2) 84 (25.5) 72 (30) 0.514
FBG (mmol/L)a 5.35 (4.39–8.56) 6.13 (4.69–10.36) 6.14 (4.72–10.38) 6.23 (4.56–10.42) 0.071
Lp(a) (mmol/L)a 230.39 (112.06–428.32) 282.16 (115.22–652.36) 308.20 (122.08–721.12) 322.03 (130.06–732.16) 0.390
TC (mmol/L) 4.40 ± 1.13 4.25 ± 1.13 4.31 ± 1.19 4.53 ± 1.15 0.724
TG (mmol/L) 1.52 ± 0.97 1.65 ± 0.96 1.64 ± 0.96 1.65 ± 0.69 0.782
LDL-C (mmol/L) 2.82 ± 0.93 2.65 ± 0.89 2.65 ± 1.02 2.94 ± 0.88 0.432
HDL-C (mmol/L) 1.17 ± 0.28 1.11 ± 0.22 1.05 ± 0.27* 1.04 ± 0.24* 0.056
Lp-PLA2(ng/ml) a 172.83 (92.35–296.42) 193.84 (102.35–372.35) 263.95 (172.32–396.45)*& 311.45 (185.24–412.35)*& < 0.001

aindicated median and inter-quartile range, *P < 0.05 versus control group, &P < 0.05 versus SA group