Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 15;5(6):e002425. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002425

Table 2.

Benefits and limitations of UCT schemes

Benefits Outcome Country
Increase ability to pay for household amenities South Africa22 27 86 87; Ethiopia88
Reduction in stress levels Malawi89; Zambia90 91; Mozambique, Yemen, Palestine92
Increase access to a nutritionally complete diet South Africa23 93; Malawi24 Ethiopia88
Improved health status South Africa22 23; Zambia94 Malawi95
An improvement in self-worth and independence Zambia92 94 South Africa96 Yemen97
Limitations Reversal of health outcomes if UCTs are rescinded South Africa22 23 93 98
Long-term recipients find difficulties in securing employment UCTs are recinded South Africa99
Funds insufficient in reducing vulnerability, including meeting both healthcare, nutrition and household needs South Africa,22 23 27 86 100–102 Zambia94 China,103 104 Peru36 Malawi,105 Vietnam106
Inability to save a surplus income creates long term dependency on UCTs South Africa86 96 99 102 107–110 Brazil77 111 112; Malawi51
Majority of schemes include pre-existing poverty in the eligibility criteria and do not protect those who are vulnerable to poverty Multiple (see 113–115)
Funding levels do not recognise the nuance of different illnesses and the range of their respective costs. Palestine116

UCTs, unconditional cash transfers.