Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 May 4;181(3):679–689. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05662-x

Table 2.

Association of cHER2 status with PFS and effect of anti-HER2 targeted therapy stratified by cHER2 status

Variables N Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis*
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) p
cHER2 status
 Low-risk 90 1.00 1.00
 High-risk 15 2.16 (1.20–3.88) 0.010 1.93 (1.03–3.61) 0.041
Anti-HER2 targeted therapy according to cHER2 status
 High-risk cHER2 without anti-HER2 targeted therapy 9 1.00 1.00
 High-risk cHER2 with anti-HER2 targeted therapy 6 0.30 (0.10–0.92) 0.035 0.30 (0.10–0.93) 0.037
 Low-risk cHER2 without anti-HER2 targeted therapy 75 1.00 1.00
 Low-risk cHER2 with anti-HER2 targeted therapy 15 0.70 (0.36–1.38) 0.306 0.72 (0.35–1.48) 0.368

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; cHER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 phenotype on circulating tumor cell; HR, hazard ratio; PFS, progression-free survival.

*

Adjusted for significant variables in univariate analysis, including tumor stage, numbers of previous chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and chemotherapy after baseline blood draw, and CTC enumeration.