Table 4.

Overview of the performance of 20 representative LFQ workflows assessed by criterion (e) accuracy. The LFQ workflows performing better and worse than unnormalization were represented by circle and cross, respectively

Workflow	2 versus 4	2 versus 10	2 versus 25	2 versus 50	4 versus 10	4 versus 25	4 versus 50	10 versus 25	10 versus 50	25 versus 50
NON-VSN-NON	×	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο
LOG-CYC-BAK	×	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	×	Ο
LOG-MED-NON	×	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	×	Ο
LOG-PQN-SVD	×	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	×	Ο	Ο
LOG-RLR-BAK	×	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	×	×
NON-RLR-NON	×	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	Ο	×	×
NON-EIG-ZER	×	×	Ο	Ο	Ο	×	×	Ο	×	Ο
BOX-MEA-BPC	×	Ο	×	×	Ο	×	×	×	×	×
BOX-VSN-BAK	×	Ο	×	×	Ο	×	×	×	×	×
BOX-ZSC-CEN	×	Ο	×	×	Ο	×	×	×	×	×
CUB-MEA-SVD	×	Ο	×	×	Ο	×	×	×	×	×
LOG-EIG-CEN	Ο	×	×	×	×	×	×	×		Ο
BOX-CYC-KNN	×	×	×	×	Ο	×	×	×	×	×
CUB-QUA-NON	×	×	×	×	Ο	×	×	×	×	×
CUB-TMM-SVD	×	×	×	×	Ο	×	×	×	×	×
LOG-MAD-ZER	×	×	×	×	Ο	×	×	×	×	×
CUB-MAD-BAK	×	×	×	×	×	×	×	×	×	×
LOG-TIC-CEN	×	×	×	×	×	×	×	×	×	×
POW-TIC-ZER	×	×	×	×	×	×	×	×	×	×