Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Caries Res. 2019 Oct 30;54(1):55–67. doi: 10.1159/000502793

Table 4.

Final model chosen by DIC using longitudinal 25(OH)D as the outcome

Model Term Mean 95% CI
Intercept common to EH extent groups 0.02 (−1.41, 1.51)
EH extent-specific intercepts
no EH 29.30 (13.03, 41.83)
EH=1 22.33 (4.40, 35.81)
EH>1 34.91 (17.94, 47.73)
Differences in EH extent-specific intercepts
no EH – EH=1 6.97 (0.36, 13.90)
no EH – EH>1 −5.61 (−10.71, −0.18)
EH=1 – EH>1 −12.58 (−20.12, −4.79)
Common time random walk
12 weeks 1.60 (−10.41, 17.29)
16 weeks 10.55 (−1.64, 27.18)
20 weeks 13.56 (1.51, 29.90)
24 weeks 15.43 (3.29, 31.85)
28 weeks 16.57 (4.33, 32.73)
32 weeks 18.88 (6.62, 35.45)
36 weeks 17.93 (5.81, 33.98)
EH extent-specific mean iPTH coefficients
no EH −0.53 (−0.67, −0.39)
EH=1 0.18 (−0.11, 0.49)
EH>1 −0.68 (−0.86, −0.50)
Differences in extent-specific mean iPTH coefficients
no EH – EH=1 −0.71 (−1.05, −0.39)
no EH – EH>1 0.15 (−0.08, 0.38)
EH=1 – EH>1 0.86 (0.51, 1.21)

The mean and 95% credible interval (CI) for all model components are shown, including those testing the differences in EH extent-specific intercepts and mean iPTH coefficients.