Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Jun 17;10:9779. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65997-9

Assessing morphological congruence in Dinobryon species and their stomatocysts, including a newly established Dinobryon pediforme–stomatocyst connection

Jolanta Piątek 1,✉, Joanna Lenarczyk 1, Marcin Piątek 2
PMCID: PMC7300117  PMID: 32555225

Abstract

The chrysophyte genus Dinobryon Ehrenberg consists of 44 taxa, which occur in freshwaters, rarely marine waters, mostly in temperate regions of the world. The taxa of Dinobryon produce characteristic solitary or dendroid colonies and resting stages called stomatocysts. Only 20 Dinobryon taxa have information on produced stomatocysts and only four stomatocysts are reliably linked with vegetative stages using modern identification standards employing scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses. In this study, an encysted material of Dinobryon pediforme (Lemmermann) Steinecke was collected in two lakes in contrasting regions of Poland. Light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses revealed that Dinobryon pediforme produces stomatocyst #61, Piątek J. that is described here as new morphotype following the International Statospore Working Group (ISWG) guidelines. This raises to five the number of reliable links between vegetative stages of Dinobryon species and corresponding stomatocysts. Phenotypic similarities between Dinobryon species and their stomatocysts, analysed for five reliably established links, showed no relationships in size and shape between loricas and stomatocysts belonging to the same species. The morphological characters of loricas and stomatocysts mapped onto the phylogenetic tree of the five Dinobryon species revealed only little congruence between their morphology and phylogenetic relationships.

Subject terms: Taxonomy, Biodiversity

Introduction

Dinobryon Ehrenberg is one of the most common and recognizable genera of the chrysophytes that are class of heterokont algae belonging to stramenopiles and whose members form resting stages called stomatocysts or cysts. The genus comprises 44 taxa1–4, which occur in oligotrophic freshwaters, rarely marine waters, mostly in temperate regions, rarely in arctic and tropical regions of the world. The species of Dinobryon form solitary or dendroid colonies with flagella cells inside each lorica. Loricas are usually cylindrical, conical, vase-shaped or funnel-shaped1.

As other chrysophytes, Dinobryon species have ability to produce siliceous resting stages called stomatocysts, which are formed endogenously within special membrane chambers. Encystment process may individually or collectively depend on several environmental factors, principally the population density of vegetative cells, but also on temperature, nutrient concentrations and endogenous factors5. Stomatocysts range from 2 to 30 μm in diameter. They are delineated based on morphology, ornamentation, and height and diameter of the cyst body, collar and pore6,7. They are species-specific and classified independently of the vegetative stages. Only 10–15% of the stomatocysts are conclusively linked with living chrysophytes which produce them8–21. It is caused by the problems with findings of encysting chrysophytes in nature and cultures; additionally many chrysophytes are usually uncultivable22.

Amongst 44 taxa belonging to the genus Dinobryon1–4 only less than half of them (20 taxa) have information (mostly of limited value) on produced stomatocyst7,19,21. For most of these stomatocysts only short description is given complemented with line drawings [12 stomatocysts, produced by D. annulatum D.K. Hilliard & Asmund, D. asmundiae Nygaard, D. bavaricum O.E. Imhof, D. borgei Lemmermann, D. crenulatum West & G.S. West, D. crenulatum f. callosum Nygaard, D. faculiferum (Willén) Willén, D. hilliardii Nygaard, D. korshikovii Matvienko, D. lindegaardii Nygaard, D. pediforme (Lemmermann) Steinecke and D. sociale (Ehrenberg) Ehrenberg] or light micrographs (one stomatocyst, produced by D. unguentariforme Croome, H.U. Ling & P.A. Tyler). The other three cysts have either only description [stomatocyst of D. cylindricum var. alpinum (O.E. Imhof) H. Bachmann], or weak SEM micrographs unsuitable for identification [stomatocysts of D. cylindricum var. palustris Lemmermann and D. sociale var. stipitatum (Stein) Lemmermann]. The accurate identification of these 16 stomatocysts of Dinobryon taxa is therefore impossible considering modern standards necessary for stomatocyst identification, i.e. employing SEM analyses. Only 4 out of 20 stomatocysts linked with vegetative stages of Dinobryon taxa are reliably identified using these standards. These are: stomatocysts produced by D. cylindricum O.E. Imhof, D. divergens O.E. Imhof, D. sertularia Ehrenberg and D. sociale var. americanum (Brunnthaler) H. Bachmann7,19,21.

One of the Dinobryon species for which encystment process and resultant stomatocyst have been insufficiently characterised before is Dinobryon pediforme7,23. The encysted populations of this chrysophyte were found in two contrasting regions of Poland. In this study, we aimed to establish a further reliable link between a stomatocyst and a vegetative Dinobryon stage, by providing LM- and SEM-based morphological characterization of D. pediforme loricas and its stomatocysts. We also tried to assess phenotypic congruence between Dinobryon vegetative stages and stomatocysts. For this purpose only those five Dinobryon species (D. cylindricum, D. divergens, D. pediforme, D. sertularia, D. sociale var. americanum), for which stomatocysts are reliably characterised using modern standard methods, were taken into account. The morphological characters were mapped onto the phylogenetic tree to analyse the congruence between phylogeny and morphology in chrysophyte species and their stomatocysts.

Materials and methods

The encysted material of Dinobryon pediforme was collected by the second author of this study in two contrasting regions of Poland: from Suchar II lake in the Wigry National Park (north-eastern Poland) on 2nd July 2008 and from Wielki Staw lake in the Karkonosze National Park (south-western Poland) on 29th July 2008. Samples were taken from both lakes using a no. 25 plankton net, either from shore near a hiking trail in Suchar II lake or from shore near the outflow of Biały Potok brook in Wielki Staw lake.

Water temperature, pH and conductivity of Suchar II lake and Wielki Staw lake were measured immediately after material collection with an Elmetron CPC-401 pH/conductivity meter. Other water parameters, including total and carbonate hardness, concentration of oxygen and chloride ions were analysed by titrimetric methods using an Aquamerck Compact Laboratory (Merck) and a Chloride test (Merck).

The examination and identification of Dinobryon and stomatocyst specimens were made using standard light and phase contrast microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). LM studies were conducted from slide preparations mounted in water, using a Nikon Eclipse 80i light microscope. Micrographs were taken with a Nikon DS-Fi1 camera. For SEM analyses, two methods of material preparation were used. First, fresh material was pipetted onto clean cover glasses, air-dried and affixed to aluminium stubs with a double-sided transparent tape. The stubs were then sputter-coated with carbon using a Cressington sputter-coater and viewed with a Hitachi S-4700 scanning electron microscope. However, in such prepared materials the membrane chamber stuck hard to the stomatocysts, so they were covered, making SEM study difficult. Therefore, for detailed identification of stomatocysts (collar, pore morphology and ornamentation) it was necessary to get rid of the membrane chamber to observe naked specimens. For this purpose material was prepared in the laboratory, where samples were placed in a glasses scintillation vials, covered with 10% HCl and allowed to stand for 24 h. They were then boiled for 15 min, rinsed several times with distilled water, pour in glass vials and covered with 95% alcohol. Finally, such prepared materials were also sputter-coated with carbon and viewed with the microscope mentioned above.

The morphological features of vegetative colonies of Dinobryon pediforme found in Suchar II lake and Wielki Staw lake follows the terminology given by Kristiansen & Preisig1. Their stomatocyst was characterised according to International Statospore Working Group (ISWG) guidelines6, and assigned number #61 Piątek J. to continue the numbering scheme of Piątek24. All measurements of Dinobryon pediforme loricas and stomatocyst specimens were taken from the fresh material directly under a light microscope and from SEM micrographs. SEM holders are available in the Department of Phycology, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, PL-31-512 Kraków, Poland. Morphological characteristics of chrysophyte and stomatocyst are depicted in Figs. 1–2.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Dinobryon pediforme in LM (a,c,e) and in SEM (b,d,f). (a–d) Dinobryon pediforme observed in Suchar II lake; (e–f) Dinobryon pediforme found in Wielki Staw lake.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Dinobryon pediforme and its stomatocyst #61 in LM (a,c) and in SEM (b,d–f). (a) Dinobryon pediforme with stomatocyst #61, which is located within a special encystment chamber, from Suchar II lake; (b) Stomatocyst #61 found in Suchar II lake. Note that “ridges” on cyst surface are in fact remnants of encystment chamber; (c) Dinobryon pediforme with stomatocyst #61, which is located within a special encystment chamber, from Wielki Staw lake; (d) Stomatocyst #61 found in Wielki Staw lake; (e) One lorica of Dinobryon pediforme and stomatocyst #61 from Wielki Staw lake; (f) Stomatocyst #61 observed in mass in Wielki Staw lake.

Lorica length, lorica width (at the mouth), and stomatocyst diameter in Dinobryon pediforme from Suchar II lake and Wielki Staw lake were compared using appropriate statistical tests after testing the assumptions of normality (Shapiro-Wilk test) and equality of variances (F test) in Past, ver. 4.01. Lorica length (N = 40) was subjected to the t test, lorica width (N = 40) to the Welch test, and stomatocyst diameter (N = 20) to the Mann-Whitney test25. P values below the threshold 0.05 were treated as statistically significant.

Dinobryon pediforme lorica and stomatocyst newly analysed here, as well as four other Dinobryon taxa for which stomatocysts can be reliably assigned (D. cylindricum, D. divergens, D. sertularia, D. sociale var. americanum, for the sizes and morphological characteristics see Tables 1 and 2), were compared by hierarchical clustering in Past, ver. 3.18, and presented as classification dendrograms (Fig. 3a,b). Clustering was based on the Jaccard’s coefficient (binary similarity index) and the UPGMA method25. The occurrence of quantitative morphological characteristics in the classification analysis was marked as “yes”, their absence was marked as “no” (Table 2). Characteristics marked with an asterisk (*) were excluded from the cluster analysis to avoid occurrence common for all five taxa and duplicate values. Both dendrograms were next elaborated using CorelDRAW, ver. 9 (Corel Corporation).

Table 1.

Sizes of loricas of the Dinobryon taxa and respective stomatocysts analysed in this study.

Vegetative stages D. cylindricum O.E. Imhof D. divergens O.E. Imhof D. pediforme (Lemmermann) Steinecke D. sertularia Ehrenberg D. sociale var. americanum (Brunnthaler) H. Bachmann
Lenght of lorica 40–115 μm 30–65 μm 27–49 μm 27.5–43.7 μm 24–40 μm
Width of lorica 8–15 μm 8–11 μm 5.0–8.3 μm 5.7–9.2 μm 7.1–11.5 μm 8.0–11.2 μm 7.1–9.6 μm
Source 36,55 36 this study 21 19
Resting stages stomatocyst 41, Duff & Smol 1989 stomatocyst 161, Zeeb & Smol 1993 stomatocyst #61, Piątek J., this paper stomatocyst 48, Piątek J. 2012 stomatocyst 79, Duff & Smol 1991
Diameter of stomatocyst 9.5–12.6 μm (average 10.8–11.5 μm) 9.6–12.7 μm 9.0–11.4 μm 13.4–16.4 μm 9.0–11.3 μm
Collar diameter of stomatocyst 2.4–4.5 μm 2.1–3.1 μm basal 1.2–2.9 μm, apical 1.7–2.2 μm 4.2–4.8 μm 2.0–3.1 μm
Collar height of stomatocyst 2.0–3.5 μm 1.0–2.8 μm 0.2–0.5 μm 1.2–1.6 μm 1.4–2.7 μm
Source 7 7 this study 21 19
Open in a new tab

Table 2.

Qualitative characteristics of the five Dinobryon taxa and corresponding stomatocysts analysed in this study.

Vegetative stages D. cylindricum O.E. Imhof D. divergens O.E. Imhof D. pediforme (Lemmermann) Steinecke D. sertularia Ehrenberg D. sociale var. americanum (Brunnthaler) H. Bachmann
Colonies dendroid no yes yes yes yes
scattered yes yes yes no no
Lorica body conical no no no yes yes
*cylindrical yes yes yes no no
middle part distended yes no no no no
middle part wavy no yes no no no
Lorica surface *smooth yes yes yes yes yes
striated no no yes no no
Lorica posterior part short yes yes yes yes no
sharpened no yes yes no yes
oblique yes yes yes no no
1-2 lateral appendages no no yes no no
Source 36 36 this study 21 19
Resting stages stomatocyst 41, Duff & Smol 1989 stomatocyst 161, Zeeb & Smol 1993 stomatocyst #61, Piątek J., this paper stomatocyst 48, Piątek J. 2012 stomatocyst 79, Duff & Smol 1991
Cyst shape obovate yes no no no no
slightly oval no yes no no no
*spherical yes yes yes yes yes
Collar shape conical yes no yes no no
cylindrical no yes no yes no
*obconical no no no no yes
hooked apex yes no no no no
Ornamentation smooth yes yes yes yes no
scabrae no no no no yes
verrucae no no no no yes
Source 7 7 this study 21 19
Open in a new tab

Occurrence of the characteristics was marked as “yes”, their absence as “no”. Characteristics marked with an asterisk (*) were excluded from the cluster analysis to avoid occurrence common for all five taxa and duplicate values.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Similarities in the shape of lorica between the five Dinobryon taxa having stomatocysts assigned to their vegetative stages on the basis of their qualitative characteristics computed using the Jaccard’s coefficient and the UPGMA clustering. Codes of the characteristics are presented in Table 2; (b) Similarities in the shape of stomatocyst between the five Dinobryon taxa having stomatocysts assigned to their vegetative stages on the basis of their qualitative characteristics computed using the Jaccard’s coefficient and the UPGMA clustering. Codes of the characteristics are presented in Table 2; (c) Mapping lorica and stomatocyst morphologies of the five Dinobryon taxa having stomatocysts assigned to their vegetative stages on their phylogenetic relationships. The tree is based on the phylogeny of Bock et al.27. Sizes of the depicted loricas and stomatocysts are means of the sizes included in Table 1.

In order to analyse the level of congruence between morphology and the phylogenetic relationships of the five Dinobryon taxa under study, a schematic phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3c) was generated in MorphoJ, ver. 1.06d26, and next elaborated using CorelDRAW X4, ver. 9 (Corel Corporation). The tree was based on the evolutionary tree of chrysophytes constructed by maximum likelihood of 18 S rDNA published by Bock et al.27 where phylogenetic relationships of all the five Dinobryon taxa under the present study can be found.

Results

Field sampling, and chrysophyte and stomatocyst morphologies

The encysted specimens of Dinobryon pediforme originated from natural populations in two freshwater lakes: Suchar II lake and Wielki Staw lake. Suchar II lake (54°05′N, 23°01′E) is a dystrophic lowland lake situated in the Wigry National Park in north-eastern Poland. The lake is surrounded with Picea abies forest. Its area is 2.6 ha, maximum depth is 10 m28. Wielki Staw lake (50°45′N, 15°42′E) is a subalpine lake situated in the Karkonosze Mountains, in the Karkonosze National Park in south-western Poland. It lies at 1225 m a.s.l. and is the largest water body in these mountains, with the area of 8.3 ha and maximum depth 24.4 m29. The occurrence of Isoëtes lacustris on the bottom of Wielki Staw lake indicates its low trophy and allows to classify it to lobelia lakes30. During the sampling the following physicochemical characters were measured: temperature 21.4 °C and 18.3 °C, pH 5.5 and 5.8, conductivity 17.0 μS cm−1 and 11.0 μS cm−1, oxygen concentration 7.1 mg l−1 and 7.2 mg l−1, total and carbonate hardness below 1.0 mmol l−1, chloride concentration ca. 6 mg l−1 Cl- in Suchar II lake and Wielki Staw lake, respectively.

The abundance of the loricas and stomatocysts differed between both populations. In the sample from Suchar II lake, loricas of Dinobryon pediforme occurred massively (Fig. 1a–d), while its stomatocysts occurred rarely, with only single specimens observed in LM and SEM preparations (Fig. 2a–b). The reverse situation was observed in the sample from Wielki Staw lake: loricas of Dinobryon pediforme were rare (Fig. 1e–f), but stomatocysts occurred in mass (Fig. 2c–f). In both lakes, mostly empty loricas of Dinobryon pediforme without a vegetative cell inside were observed. The stomatocysts occurred separately, but usually within the encystment chambers; however, the stomatocysts included within chambers in the stage of leaving the chrysophyte lorica were also observed (Fig. 2a), confirming their link to Dinobryon pediforme. The stomatocyst of Dinobryon pediforme was not described before by modern standard methods and is therefore assigned to new morphotype.

The morphologies of Dinobryon pediforme and its newly affiliated stomatocyst, based on collected specimens, are given below.

Dinobryon pediforme (Lemmermann) Steinecke Fig. 1a–f.

Synonyms: Dinobryon protuberans var. pediforme Lemmermann, D. cylindricum var. pediforme Lemmermann, D. divergens var. pediforme (Lemmermann) Brunnthaler.

Number of specimens (loricas): in mass in Suchar II lake (Fig. 1a–d), rarely in Wielki Staw lake (Fig. 1e–f).

LM morphology: Colonies dendriod, but mostly disintegrated into single loricas. Lorica bodies cylindrical, hyaline, with smooth or sometimes more or less striated surface; mouth more or less extended; the base asymmetrical with 1–2 lateral processes. Loricas 27.1–49.0 μm long, and 5.7–7.6 μm, 5.7–7.6 μm, 7.1–10.5 μm wide (posterior, middle and anterior parts, respectively).

SEM morphology: Loricas in the anterior part cylindrical, straight or more or less wavy; mouth more or less extended; the posterior asymmetrical with 1–2 lateral processes, short with truncate cone (Fig. 1a). Loricas (29.3–)32.0–46.7 μm long and 5.0–8.3, 6.7–9.2, 8.0–11.5 μm wide (posterior, middle and anterior parts, respectively).

Comments: The sizes of loricas within and between the populations of Dinobryon pediforme from Suchar II lake and Wielki Staw lake were roughly similar (length 32.0–49.0 μm and width 5.0–10.0 μm, length 27.1–40.4 μm and width 5.5–11.5 μm, respectively). Statistical differences were observed in lorica length (t = 10.91, p = 2.34 10−17), but not in lorical width (t = 0.06, p = 0.96), between the two populations. Loricas were smooth and striated even within the same colony in both populations; sometimes, from one parental lorica two morphologically different daughter loricas were emerged: one smooth and other clearly striated (Fig. 1d).

Stomatocyst #61, Piątek J., this paper Fig. 2a–f.

Biological affinity: Dinobryon pediforme (Lemmermann) Steinecke (established here).

Picture-file number: SuchII–02, Fig. 2b.

Number of specimens: about 30–40 in Suchar II lake (Fig. 2a,b), in mass in Wielki Staw lake (Fig. 2c–f).

LM morphology: Stomatocysts smooth and spherical, 9.2–11.4 μm in diameter, usually 10.5 μm, located within an encystment chambers, pore not visible (Fig. 2a,c).

SEM morphology: Stomatocysts smooth and spherical, 9.0–11.2 μm in diameter, sometimes located within an encystment chambers, which stuck to the cyst wall during the drying SEM preparations (Fig. 2b,e). Collar conical, sometimes with flat planar annulus. Collar in the basal part 1.2–2.9 μm and in the apical part 1.7–2.2 μm in diameter, and 0.2–0.5 μm high. Pore 0.4–0.9 μm in diameter, surrounded by a swollen pseudoannulus or rarely by a planar pseudoannulus.

Comments: The sizes of stomatocysts, and their collars and pores in two studied populations were roughly similar. The cyst diameter was 9.5–11.4 μm in Suchar II lake and 9.0–10.5 μm in Wielki Staw lake, but differed statistically (U = 32, p = 5.54 10−6). The collar of stomatocysts had the same height in both populations, but in the population from Wielki Staw lake the collar had an irregular edge. Another difference was observed in the size of basal diameter of the collar, which was smaller in the population from Wielki Staw lake (1.2–2.0 μm) than in the population from Suchar II lake (2.1–2.9 μm). Finally, some differences were also observed in the size of the pore diameter, which was smaller in specimens from Wielki Staw lake (0.4–0.7 μm) than from Suchar II lake (0.7–0.9 μm).

Stomatocyst #61, Piątek J. belongs to a series of stomatocysts having similar morphologies but different cyst body sizes, including stomatocyst 52, Duff & Smol 1991 emend. Duff et al.7,31; stomatocyst 234, Duff et al.7; stomatocyst 127, Duff & Smol in Duff et al.32; and stomatocyst 197, Duff & Smol 199433. According to Duff et al.7, the ranges of cyst body sizes for these stomatocysts are <5 μm, 5.0–9.9 μm, 10.0–15.0 μm, and > 15.0 μm, respectively. In such scheme, the stomatocyst of Dinobryon pediforme is placed between the upper size values of stomatocyst 234 and lower size values of stomatocyst 127. The original cyst body sizes reported for the latter cyst were 12.6–15.0 μm32 and only later augmented to 10.0–15.0 μm7. Considering this fact, the stomatocyst of Dinobryon pediforme, described here as new stomatocyst #61, Piątek J., perfectly fits into the “space” between sizes of stomatocyst 234 and stomatocyst 127. Consequently, the following ranges of cyst body sizes for the discussed group of stomatocysts are newly delineated here (some values were rounded): stomatocyst 52 <5 μm, stomatocyst 234 – 5.0–9.0 μm, stomatocyst 61–9.0–12.0 μm, stomatocyst 127–12.0–15.0 μm, and stomatocyst 197 >15.0 μm.

Comparative analysis of phenotypic congruence between Dinobryon vegetative stages and their stomatocysts

Comparative analysis of lorica morphology of five Dinobryon taxa, whose stomatocysts are reliably characterised (D. cylindricum, D. divergens, D. pediforme, D. sertularia, D. sociale var. americanum), revealed that D. pediforme, D. sertularia and D. sociale var. americanum produce shorter loricas than D. cylindricum and D. divergens, but all of them have similar width (with the exception of D. cylindricum, which lorica is somewhat wider) (Table 1).

The shape of vegetative stages of Dinobryon pediforme was most similar to the stages of D. divergens. Both taxa produce dendroid or scattered colonies composed of cylindrical loricas with short, sharpened and oblique ends. The other taxon, D. cylindricum, producing scattered colonies of cylindrical loricas with a short, oblique, but not sharpened ends, is similar to these two taxa. The lorica posterior part in D. pediforme can posses additional 1–2 lateral appendages, whereas D. divergens has a wavy middle part of lorica and D. cylindricum has a distended one. In contrast, the colonies of D. sertularia and D. sociale var. americanum are dendroid and composed of conical loricas with a straight posterior part (Fig. 3a,c, Table 2).

No relationships in size between loricas and stomatocysts belonging to the same taxa were observed. Four of five taxa under study with different sizes of lorica produce stomatocysts which are similar in size. Dinobryon sertularia, whose loricas are rather short, produces clearly bigger stomatocysts. In three taxa (D. divergens, D. pediforme and D. sociale var. americanum), their stomatocyst diameter is similar to the lorica width, except for that of D. sertularia which produces cysts much bigger than the lorica width (Table 1).

The collar diameter is bigger that its height in both Dinobryon pediforme and D. sertularia. Both species produce stomatocysts with a short collar, compared to the other three taxa. The collar diameter and the collar height overlap in the remaining three taxa (Table 1).

The shape of stomatocysts is not connected with the shape of vegetative stages which produce them, as taxa most similar to each other with respect to shape of loricas are not similar to each other with respect to the shape of stomatocysts. Dinobryon sertularia forms a common clade either with D. sociale var. americanum in the tree showing the shape of loricas or with Dinobryon divergens in the tree showing the shape of stomatocysts (Fig. 3a–b, Table 2).

The stomatocyts of Dinobryon divergens and D. sertularia, mostly similar with regard to their shape, are spherical or slightly oval (in D. divergens), smooth and have a cylindrical collar. The stomatocysts of D. pediforme and D. cylindricum are also very similar to each other. They are spherical and smooth, but have conical collars, sometimes with an irregular edge. Dinobryon cylindricum produces stomatocysts, which are sphaerical or obovate, smooth and have conical collars with a hooked apex. In contrast, stomatocysts of D. sociale var. americanum, forming a separate lineage in the tree showing the cyst morphologies, are covered with scabrae and verrucae, mainly in the posterior hemisphere, and have obconical collars (Fig. 3b, Table 2).

Mapping morphological data on loricas and stomatocysts of the five analysed Dinobryon taxa on the phylogenetic tree shows that their sizes are not connected with phylogeny, whereas their shapes only little reflect natural evolutionary relationships of the taxa. Dinobryon sociale var. americanum, D. sertularia and D. cylindricum, being most closely related, produce different types of colonies, loricas and stomatocysts (including their collar and ornamentation). Dinobryon divergens, which forms a separate phylogenetic lineage, possesses wavy middle parts of loricas, which is a clear difference between this taxon and the remaining four taxa (Fig. 3c, Tables 1 and 2).

Discussion

Dinobryon pediforme is a freshwater species, occurring in subarctic regions and humic acid waters34. It is recorded from Europe and North America, and it was recently used as a bioindicator species tied with strongly acid, often humic conditions35. In this study, the encystment of Dinobryon pediforme was observed in two natural populations in Poland. It is worth to note that the encystment process of chrysophytes in natural populations is rarely observed5 and usually only a small fraction of living chrysophyte cells undergoes the stomatocyst development13,14. Previously, the stomatocyst production by Dinobryon pediforme was documented only few times by line drawings from observations made in light microscope. The illustrative documentation was, however, weak and contradictory. Krieger23 (repeated by Starmach36,37), Nygaard38 and Juriš39 depicted globoid stomatocysts with a pore lacking collar. Stomatocysts were located in special encystment chambers and were in stage of leaving the lorica. The pore of stomatocysts was oriented towards the upper part of encystment chamber. By contrast, Skuja40 and Ermolaev and Safonova41 depicted globoid stomatocysts with a well developed collar (and therefore invisible pore). Stomatocysts were located in special encystment chambers and were in stage of leaving the loricas, but the collar (with invisible pore) of stomatocysts was oriented towards the lower part of the chamber. The morphology of stomatocysts of Dinobryon pediforme observed in Poland were more similar to those depicted by Krieger23, Nygaard38 and Juriš39 than to those illustrated by Skuja40 and Ermolaev and Safonova41. The collar and pore were not visible in LM, but the low collar and pore were visible in SEM. The stomatocyst produced by Dinobryon pediforme cannot be assigned to any of the stomatocysts described by modern SEM-based methods and is therefore described in this study as new morphotype.

With this study, the number of reliably established Dinobryon-stomatocyst links raised to five and include D. cylindricum–stomatocyst 41, Duff & Smol 19897,42, D. divergens–stomatocyst 161, Zeeb & Smol 19937,43, D. pediforme–stomatocyst #61, Piątek J. (this study), D. sertularia–stomatocyst 48, Piątek J. 201221, and D. sociale var. americanum–stomatocyst 79, Duff & Smol 199119,31. All these Dinobryon taxa are freshwater species. Four of them (D. cylindricum, D. divergens, D. sertularia, D. sociale var. americanum) are common cosmopolitan species, recorded frequently from different localities worldwide. Dinobryon pediforme has been recorded so far only from Europe and North America. The known geographical distribution of these Dinobryon species generally corresponds to the known distribution of their stomatocysts. Species of Dinobryon were recorded more frequently and from more continents because they were longer studied and by more researchers compared to stomatocysts. A good example might be the case of D. sertularia, which was recorded many times from all continents except Antarctica, while its stomatocyst – stomatocyst 48, Piątek J. 201221 was recorded only from Africa.

A common view is that stomatocysts are species-specific10,16. The same holds true for the analysed Dinobryon taxa – all of them have specific stomatocysts. An interesting case is Dinobryon cylindricum. Its cyst is assigned to stomatocyst 41, Duff & Smol 19897,42. Two other cysts, stomatocysts 78, Duff & Smol 199131 and 233, Zeeb et al.44 are similar morphologically and could be produced by closely related Dinobryon species7. It is also not excluded that they all are produced by Dinobryon cylindricum but represent three developmental phases: immature stomatocyst, slightly immature stomatocyst and mature stomatocyst14,45.

Other than linking Dinobryon pediforme with new stomatocyst #61, Piątek J., this study assessed phenotypic congruence between vegetative stages of selected Dinobryon taxa (D. cylindricum, D. divergens, D. pediforme, D. sertularia and D. sociale var. americanum) and their stomatocysts, as well as mapping respective morphologies onto phylogenetic tree.

No relationships in size between loricas and stomatocysts belonging to the same taxa analysed in the present study may result from different amounts of elements which are used by individual taxa to build stomatocysts. So far, we do not have much data on environmental conditions causing the encystment process5, as many chrysophyte taxa are usually not willing to grow in cultures and finding the encysting specimens in natural and laboratory conditions is problematic22. The fact that the diameter of stomatocysts in analysed Dinobryon species was similar or bigger (in D. sertularia) than the lorica width resulted from the encystment process which in all Dinobryon species occurs within the special chamber at the mouth of the lorica1. This character may be, however, genetically fixed.

Similarly, the shape of stomatocysts of the five Dinobryon taxa analysed in the present study is not connected with the shape of vegetative stages which produce them. This means that the morphological evolution of loricas goes independently from that of stomatocysts. However, some genes can be linked and, consequently, responsible for common occurrence of some morphological traits, which can be observed in both plant and animals46.

The genomic and phylogenetic studies on the genus Dinobryon are still at the initial level20,22,27,47–50. The comprehensive studies of Bock et al.27, whose 18S rDNA phylogeny was a reference for the tree reconstructed in the present study, analysed relationships between all five taxa being under the present study and additional two taxa, D. sociale and D. cf. sociale. Only little congruence between morphology of the five Dinobryon taxa and their phylogeny revealed in the present study suggests that morphological characters can be the effect of homoplasy or DNA regions used for reconstructing phylogenetic relationships so far are not sufficient. Such lack of congruence has previously been found in many microscopic algae51–53. However, congruence between morphology and molecular phylogeny has been observed in the chrysophyte genus Synura54. Mapping morphological traits on the tree based on the whole nuclear genomes would be more reliable and must be the aim of future research. Together with matching other Dinobryon taxa with their stomatocysts, genomic studies should be the next necessary step to understand the phylogeny of this genus.

Acknowledgements

SEM micrographs were taken in the Laboratory of Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis at the Institute of Geological Sciences of the Jagiellonian University. We thank Anna Łatkiewicz (Kraków, Poland) for her assistance with the SEM pictures. This study was partly financed through the statutory funds of the W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.

Author contributions

J.P. identification and descriptions of species and stomatocysts, preparation of figures, drafting the manuscript. J.L. sampling, statistical work and analyses, drafting the manuscript. M.P. analysis the data, drafting the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Kristiansen J, Preisig HR. Encyclopedia of chrysophyte genera. Bibl. Phycol. 2001;110:1–260. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hall JD, Karol KG. An inventory of the algae (excluding diatoms) of lakes and ponds of Harriman and Bear Mountain State Parks (Rockland and Orange Counties, New York, USA) Brittonia. 2016;68:148–169. doi: 10.1007/s12228-016-9409-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jiang XD, et al. Dinobryon ningwuensis (Chrysophyta, Dinobryaceae), a new freshwater species described from Shanxi province, China. Phytotaxa. 2018;374:221–230. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.374.3.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jiang XD, et al. Dinobryon taiyuanensis (Chrysophyta, Dinobryaceae), a new freshwater species described from Shanxi province, China. Phytotaxa. 2019;404:41–50. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.404.1.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Agbeti MD, Smol JP. Chrysophyte population and encystment patterns in two Canadian lakes. J. Phycol. 1995;31:70–78. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1995.00070.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cronberg, G. & Sandgren, C. D. A proposal for the development of standardized nomenclature and terminology for chrysophycean statospores. In: Chrysophytes: aspects and problems (eds. Kristiansen, J. & Andersen, R. A.), 317–328 (Cambridge University Press, 1986).
  • 7.Duff, K. E., Zeeb, B. A. & Smol, J. P. Atlas of chrysophycean cysts. Developments in Hydrobiology 99, 1–189 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995).
  • 8.Smol JP. The stomatocyst of Mallomonas pseudocoronata (Mallomonadaceae, Chrysophyceae) Nord. J. Bot. 1984;4:827–831. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1984.tb02014.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cronberg G. Variability in size and ultrastructure of the statospore of Mallomonas caudata. Hydrobiologia. 1988;161:31–39. doi: 10.1007/BF00044097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cronberg G. Stomatocysts of Mallomonas hamata and M. heterospina (Mallomonadaceae, Synurophyceae) from South Swedish lakes. Nord. J. Bot. 1989;8:683–692. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1989.tb01745.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cronberg G. Uroglena dendracantha n. sp. (Chrysophyceae) from Central Småland. Sweden. Nord. J. Bot. 1992;12:507–512. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1992.tb01829.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cronberg, G. Mallomonas variabilis, sp. nov. (Synurophyceae) with stomatocysts found in Lake Konnevesi, Finland. In: Chrysophytes algae. Ecology, phylogeny and development (eds. Sandgren, C. D., Smol, J. P. & Kristiansen, J.), 333–344 (Cambridge University Press, 1995).
  • 13.Kristiansen J. Occurrence and seasonal cycle of Mallomonas teilingii (Synurophyceae), with special reference to the effects of parasitism. Beih. Nova Hedwigia. 1989;95:179–189. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Siver PA. The stomatocyst of Mallomonas acaroids v. muskokana (Chrysophyceae) J. Paleolimnol. 1991;5:11–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zeeb, B. A. & Smol, J. P. Chrysophyte scales and cysts. – In: Tracking environmental change using lake sediments. Volume 3: Terrestrial, algal, and siliceous indicators (eds. Smol, J. P., Birks, H. J. B. & Last, W. M.), 203–223 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001).
  • 16.Cronberg G, Laugaste R. New species of Uroglena and Ochromonas (Chromulinales, Chrysophyceae) from Estonia. Beih. Nova Hedwigia. 2005;128:43–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Coradeghini A, Vigna MS. The aerial epiphytic stomatocyst flora (Chrysophyceae and Synurophyceae) of mosses from Primavera Station, Antarctica. Nova Hedwigia. 2008;86:401–417. doi: 10.1127/0029-5035/2008/0086-0401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kim HS, Kim JH. Mallomonas koreana sp. nov. (Synurophyceae), a new species from South Korea. Nova Hedwigia. 2008;86:496–476. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Piątek J, Kowalska J. The stomatocyst of Dinobryon sociale var. americanum (Chrysophyceae) Nova Hedwigia. 2008;87:161–167. doi: 10.1127/0029-5035/2008/0087-0161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Findenig BM, Chatzinotas A, Boenigk J. Taxonomic and ecological characterization of stomatocysts of Spumella-like flagellates (Chrysophyceae) J. Phycol. 2010;46:868–881. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00892.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Piątek J, Piątek M, Mossebo DC. The first discovery of an encysted chrysophyte in Africa: Dinobryon sertularia Ehrenb. from Cameroon. Nova Hedwigia. 2012;95:391–401. doi: 10.1127/0029-5035/2012/0058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jost S, Medinger R, Boenigk J. Cultivation – independent species identification of Dinobryon species (Chrysophyceae) by means of multiplex single–cell PCR. J. Phycol. 2010;46:901–906. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00871.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Krieger W. Unterssuchungen über Plankton-Chrysomonaden. Die Gattungen Mallomonas und Dinobryon in monographischer Bearbeitung. Bot. Arch. 1930;29:257–329. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Piątek J. A morphotype-rich assemblage of chrysophycean stomatocysts in mountain lakes in the Cameroon Highlands. Africa. Cryptogamie, Algol. 2017;38:159–180. doi: 10.7872/crya/v38.iss2.2017.159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaentologia Electronica. 2001;4:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Klingenberg CP. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011;11:353–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bock C, Medinger R, Jost S, Psenner R, Boenigk J. Seasonal variation of planktonic chrysophytes with special focus on Dinobryon. Fottea. 2014;14:179–190. doi: 10.5507/fot.2014.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Górniak, A. & Krzysztofiak, L. Charakterystyka limnologiczna parku. In: Jeziora Wigierskiego Parku Narodowego. Aktualna jakość i trofia wód (ed. Górniak, A.), 25–34 (Uniwersytet w Białymstoku, 2006).
  • 29.Choiński, A. Katalog jezior Polski. Część trzecia: Pojezierze Wielkopolsko-Kujawskie (Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, 1995).
  • 30.Rąpała, R. Natura 2000 w Karkonoskim Parku Narodowym (Karkonoski Park Narodowy, 2008).
  • 31.Duff KE, Smol JP. Morphological descriptions and stratigraphic distributions of the chrysophycean stomatocysts from a recently acidified lake (Adirondack Park, N.Y.) J. Paleolimnol. 1991;5:73–113. doi: 10.1007/BF00226558. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Duff KE, Douglas MSV, Smol JP. Chrysophyte cysts in 36 Canadian high arctic ponds. Nord. J. Bot. 1992;12:471–499. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1992.tb01331.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Duff KE, Smol JP. Chrysophycean cyst flora from British Columbia (Canada) lakes. Nova Hedwigia. 1994;58:353–389. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.John, D. M., Whitton, B. A. & Brook, A. J. The freshwater algal flora of the British Isles (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
  • 35.Bellinger, E. G. & Sigee, D. C. Freshwater algae. Identification, enumeration and use as bioindicators (Wiley Blackwell, 2015).
  • 36.Starmach, K. Chrysophyta I. Chrysophyceae – złotowiciowce (oraz zooflagellata wolnożyjące). II wydanie zmienione. In: Flora Słodkowodna Polski. 5 (eds. Starmach K. & Siemińska J.). (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1980).
  • 37.Starmach, K. Chrysophyceae und Haptophyceae. In: Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. 1 (eds. Ettl, H., Gerloff, J., Heynig, H. & Mollenhauer, D.). (VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1985).
  • 38.Nygaard, G. Dansk Planteplankton. En Flora over de vigtigste Ferskvandsformer. (Gyldendalske Boghandel Nordisk Forlag, 1945).
  • 39.Juriš Š. Riasy rašeliniska Bór (I. Orava, Slovensko) Biologia (Bratislava) 1955;10:700–718. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Skuja, H. Grundzüge der Algenflora und Algenvegetation der Fjeldgegenden um Abisko in Schwedisch-Lappland. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum Upsaliensis, Ser. IV18(3), 1–465 + Tab. I–LXIX (1964).
  • 41.Ermolaev VN, Safonova TA. Algae of the genus Dinobryon Ehr. (Chrysophyta) from the water bodies of Taimyr. Botaničeskij Žurnal. 1974;59:556–560. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Duff, K. E. & Smol, J. P. Chrysophycean stomatocysts from the postglacial sediments of Tasikutaaq Lake, Baffin Island, N.W.T. Can. J. Bot. 67, 1649−1656 (1989).
  • 43.Zeeb BA, Smol JP. Chrysophycean stomatocyst flora from Elk Lake, Clearwater County, Minnesota. Can. J. Bot. 1993;71:737–756. doi: 10.1139/b93-086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zeeb BA, et al. Responses of diatom and chrysophyte assemblage in Lake 227 to experimental eutrophication. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1994;51:2300–2311. doi: 10.1139/f94-233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Piątek J, Piątek M. The variability of new chrysophyte stomatocyst forming a single-cyst assemblage in low-conductivity tropical lake in the Guineo-Congolian rainforest. Phytotaxa. 2014;174(5):261–271. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.174.5.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Brown, T. A. Genomy (Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, 2001).
  • 47.Andersen RA, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of the SSU rRNA from members of the Chrysophyceae. Protist. 1999;150:71–84. doi: 10.1016/S1434-4610(99)70010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Balzano S, et al. Diversity of cultured photosynthetic flagellates in the northeast Pacific and Arctic Oceans in summer. Biogeosciences. 2012;9:4553–4571. doi: 10.5194/bg-9-4553-2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bock C, Chatzinotas A, Boenigk J. Genetic diversity in chrysophytes: comparison of different gene markers. Fottea. 2017;17:209–221. doi: 10.5507/fot.2017.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Grossmann L, Bock C, Schweikert M, Boenigk J. Small but manifold – hidden diversity in “Spumella-like flagellates”. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2016;63:419–439. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.McManus H, Lewis LA. Molecular phylogenetic relationships in the freshwater family Hydrodictyaceae (Sphaeropleales, Chlorophyceae), with an emphasis on Pediastrum duplex. J. Phycol. 2011;47:152–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00940.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lenarczyk J, Piątek J. Assesing phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data of Pseudopediastrum boryanum and morphologically similar taxa. Phycologia. 2017;56:114. doi: 10.2216/16-36.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lenarczyk J, Saługa M. Evolutionary relationships between the varieties of green algae Pediastrum boryanum and P. duplex s.l. (Chlorophyceae, Hydrodictyaceae) Fottea. 2018;18:170–188. doi: 10.5507/fot.2018.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Škaloud, P. et al. Comparing morphological and molecular estimates of species diversity in the freshwater genus Synura (Stramenopiles): a model for understanding diversity of eukaryotic microorganisms. J. Phycol., 10.1111/jpy.12978 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 55.Matvienko, O. M. Vyznachnyk prisnovodnykh vodorostei Ukrainskoi RSR. III(1) Zolotysti vodorosti – Chrysophyta (Kyjv: Naukova Dumka, 1965).

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES