Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 8;115(6):507–514. doi: 10.1111/vox.12968

Table 3.

Comparison of clinical features and outcomes between the treatment (Convalescent Plasma) group and the control (non‐convalescent plasma) group (modified from [15,16,25]).

CCP treatment group (n = 19) Control (Non‐CCP) group (n = 10) P value
Demographics
Age, years 55.00 (46.00–67.00) 53.00 (46.50–60.50) 0.743
Gender
Male 11 (58) 6 (60) 1.000
Female 8 (42) 4 (40)
Comorbidity
Yes 13 (68) 6 (60) 0.698
No 6 (32) 4 (40)
Laboratory test parameters
C‐reactive protein 65.02 (29.50–157.85) 96.70 (33.92–173.39) 0.7088
Lymphocyte a 0.65 (0.53–0.90) 0.76 (0.54–1.32) 0.469
SaO2 a 93.00 (89.00–96.50) 93.00 (87.50–97.50) 0.923
Clinical outcome
Death 0 (0) 3(30) <0.001*
Stable 2 (10) 6(60)
Improved 8 (42) 1(10)
Discharged 9 (48) 0(0)

Continuous variable (age) is expressed as median (IQR) and compared with Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical data are n (%) of patients, where n is the total number of patients with available data, and compared with Fisher’s exact test between convalescent plasma treatment group and control group. SaO2, oxyhaemoglobin saturation. Reference ranges are as follows: C‐reactive protein, normal range < 8 mg/l; lymphocyte count, 1.2–3.4 × 109/l; SaO2 %, normal range ≥ 95%.

a

Among the 19 patients in CP treatment group, nine patients did not have their blood lymphocyte and SaO2 data available.

*

P < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test.