Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 18;20:257. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01344-2

Table 1.

The prognostic significance of ITGA and ITGB superfamily members in predicting RFS in HGSOC patients in TCGA dataset

Variables Number of patients Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Age 405 1.005 (0.993–1.018) 0.391 / /
Stage 0.035 0.065
 Early 23 1 1
 Late 382 2.255 (1.060–4.796) 2.046 (0.956–4.379)
Debulking 0.546 /
 Optimal 302 1 / /
 Suboptimal 103 1.100 (0.807–1.501) / /
ITGA1 405 0.882 (0.570–1.362) 0.570 / /
ITGA2 405 0.778 (0.528–1.147) 0.205 / /
ITGA4 405 1.060 (0.679–1.655) 0.798 / /
ITGA5 405 1.152(0.950–1.396) 0.150 / /
ITGA6 405 0.863 (0.723–1.029) 0.100 0.888 (0.739–1.068) 0.207
ITGA7 405 1.086 (0.916–1.287) 0.341 / /
ITGA8 405 1.040 (0.714–1.515) 0.838 / /
ITGA9 405 1.054 (0.754–1.451) 0.788 / /
ITGA10 405 0.893 (0.618–1.292) 0.549 / /
ITGB1 405 1.327 (1.002–1.757) 0.048 1.341 (1.018–1.767) 0.037
ITGB2 405 1.039 (0.928–1.162) 0.506 / /
ITGB3 405 0.769 (0.451–1.311) 0.335 / /
ITGB4 405 1.054 (0.936–1.186) 0.385 / /
ITGB5 405 1.080 (0.911–1.280) 0.375 / /
ITGB6 405 0.874 (0.659–1.159) 0.349 / /
ITGB7 405 0.834 (0.614–1.133) 0.245 / /
ITGB8 405 1.124 (0.962–1.314) 0.142 0.888 (0.739–1.068) 0.207