Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Mar 16;75(17):2156–2165. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.060

Table 4.

Association of Circulating ICAM-1 and Indices of Systolic and Diastolic Function at Year 30.

Log transformed Year 7 ICAM-1 Log-transformed Year 15 ICAM-1

Echocardiographic Variable (Dependent Variable) N β coefficient per SD increase (SE) P value N β coefficient per SD increase (SE) P value
Systolic Function
GLS 1434 1863
 Unadjusted 0.29 (0.07) <0.001 0.45 (0.06) <0.001
 Model 1* 0.06 (0.08) 0.41 0.18 (0.06) 0.004
Circumferential Strain 1383 1794
 Unadjusted 0.29 (0.10) 0.005 0.49 (0.09) <0.001
 Model 1* 0.24 (0.12) 0.04 0.31 (0.10) 0.001
Diastolic Function
e’ average 1495 1934
 Unadjusted −0.09 (0.06) 0.12 −0.17 (0.05) <0.001
 Model 1* 0.04 (0.06) 0.51 −0.02 (0.05) 0.63
E/e’ 1472 1903
 Unadjusted 0.15 (0.06) 0.02 0.26 (0.05) <0.001
 Model 1* −0.04 (0.07) 0.59 0.07 (0.06) 0.20

GLS = global longitudinal strain; ICAM-1 = intercellular adhesion molecule-1.

*

Adjusted for age, sex, race, systolic blood pressure, anti-hypertensive medication use, total cholesterol, diabetes, number of cigarettes per day, body mass index, creatinine, field center, and image quality score. Covariates obtained at the corresponding exam as ICAM-1 measurements were used for analyses.