Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 18;20:955. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08960-7

Table 3.

The severity of two-week illnesses in Tibet in 2018

Characteristics a Duration a Being bedridden a Being off work
Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI
Gender Male 8.47 (8.13,8.82) 4.53 (3.51,5.54) 1.64 (0.18,3.10)
Female 8.54 (8.27,8.81) 4.43 (3.78,5.07) 2.29 (0.03,4.56)
*ǂ Age 15–29 7.41 (6.72,8.10) 3.04 (1.54,4.55) 1.67 (0.21,5.46)
30–44 7.77 (7.36,8.19) 3.40 (2.56,4.25) 2.20 (1.77,6.17)
45–59 8.52 (8.19,8.86) 4.05 (3.19,4.91) 1.94 (0.08,3.80)
60- 9.54 (9.14,9.95) 6.32 (5.14,7.50) 2.17 (0.34,7.74)
*#ǂ Residence Urban 8.18 (7.77,8.59) 4.20 (3.24,5.16) 1.40 (0.12,2.92)
Rural 8.65 (8.41,8.89) 4.59 (3.93,5.25) 2.29 (0.38,4.19)
*ǂ Education Illiterate 9.05 (8.78,9.33) 5.35 (4.55,6.15) 2.58 (0.68,5.85)
Primary school 7.89 (7.51,8.26) 3.55 (2.74,4.36) 1.53 (0.09,2.98)
Junior middle school 7.54 (6.76,8.32) 2.36 (0.76,3.96) 2.00 (0.70,3.30)
High school 8.00 (6.89,9.11) 4.31 (1.95,6.67) / /
University and above 7.00 (2.93,11.07) / / / /
*Economic level Low 8.45 (8.01,8.89) 3.93 (2.91,4.94) 4.62 (3.36,5.88)
Medium 8.67 (8.38,8.96) 4.92 (4.09,5.75) 2.83 (2.07,3.60)
High 8.28 (7.86,8.70) 4.13 (3.12,5.14) 2.38 (1.43,3.33)
*Marital status Married 8.33 (8.09,8.56) 3.98 (3.39,4.56) 1.84 (0.48,3.20)
Unmarried 9.10 (8.29,9.91) 4.77 (2.61,6.94) 1.00 (0.12,13.71)
Widow 9.31 (8.69,9.93) 6.54 (4.70,8.38) 6.50 (0.76,8.90)
Divorce 8.10 (6.82,9.39) 4.11 (0.54,7.68) / /
Others 10.94 (8.66,13.22) 6.00 (1.93,10.07) / /
*ǂ Employment status Employed 8.11 (7.86,8.36) 3.61 (3.02,2.00) 2.00 (0.67,3.33)
Retired 9.74 (8.56,10.92) 3.33 (0.13,6.79) / /
Laid-off 10.00 (8.87,11.13) 6.53 (3.25,9.81) / /
Unemployed 9.40 (8.95,9.85) 6.17 (5.03,7.32) / /
Student 7.63 (3.29,11.96) / / / /

a: measured in days

*: There were differences in duration among the different groups, p < 0.05

ǂ: There were differences in being bedridden among the different groups, p < 0.05

#: There were differences in the duration of being off work among the different groups, p < 0.05

/: There were no subjects satisfying the grouping condition