TABLE 2.
Mean sodium intake and regression coefficients of associations with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and practices related to salt consumption in an adult population in Campinas, San Paulo, Brazil.1
Bivariate model (g/d) | Multivariate model (g/d) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | ||||||||
Variables | n | Mean2 | CI | P value | R 3 | P value | R 3 | P value | R 4 | P value |
Sex | ||||||||||
Male | 372 | 3.79 | 3.56, 4.10 | |||||||
Female | 480 | 2.88 | 2.75, 3.00 | <0.0001 | −0.91 | <0.0001 | −0.90 | <0.0001 | −0.70 | <0.0001 |
Race/skin color | ||||||||||
White | 532 | 3.24 | 3.07, 3.41 | |||||||
Black/brown | 301 | 3.40 | 3.22, 3.59 | 0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Schooling | ||||||||||
0–8 | 326 | 3.25 | 3.05, 3.45 | |||||||
9–11 y | 300 | 3.40 | 3.20, 3.60 | 0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
≥12 y | 225 | 3.25 | 3.00, 3.49 | 0.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Income per capita | ||||||||||
≤BMMW | 337 | 3.27 | 3.00, 3.53 | |||||||
1–3 x BMMW | 413 | 3.30 | 3.14, 3.52 | 0.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
>3 x BMMW | 102 | 3.31 | 3.01, 3.61 | 0.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Location of meals | ||||||||||
At home | 483 | 3.12 | 2.93, 3.33 | |||||||
Outside of home | 197 | 3.49 | 3.25, 3.73 | 0.002 | — | — | 0.22 | 0.005 | 0.17 | 0.010 |
Reads sodium content on labels | ||||||||||
No | 354 | 3.31 | 3.07, 3.55 | |||||||
Yes | 87 | 3.39 | 3.02, 3.76 | 0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Concerned about salt intake | ||||||||||
No | 327 | 3.37 | 3.16, 3.57 | |||||||
Yes | 525 | 3.23 | 3.14, 3.42 | 0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Self-rated salt intake | ||||||||||
Inadequate | 114 | 3.51 | 3.21, 3.81 | |||||||
Adequate | 737 | 3.27 | 3.13, 3.41 | 0.114 | −0.22 | 0.10 | — | — | — | — |
BMMW: Brazilian monthly minimum wage.
Mean sodium intake (in grams) based on one-day 24-h dietary recall.
Regression coefficient.
Regression coefficient adjusted by total energy.