Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 18.
Published in final edited form as: Health Psychol. 2016 Nov 3;36(3):236–244. doi: 10.1037/hea0000445

Table 4.

Indirect, Direct, and Component Path Estimates for the Accepted Path Model for Each Diabetes Outcome

Indirect effect ACS → DRD → diabetes outcome
Direct effect ACS → diabetes outcome
Tested model diabetes outcome path a path b overall effect [95% CI] path c′ overall effect [95% CI]
Model 1a total blood glucose checks .71*** −.07* −.08* [−.19, −.01] −.01 −.01 [−.34, .35]
Model 2a self-care behaviors .72*** −.04*** −.05** [−.08, −.02] −.21** −.18** [−.29, −.08]
Model 3a A1c .70*** .003* .004* [.001, .01] .01 .01 [−.01, .04]

Note. Unstandardized path estimates are presented. Continuous variables were grand-mean-centered prior to analyses. ACS = avoidant coping style; DRD = diabetes-related distress; CI = confidence interval; A1c = hemoglobin A1c.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.