Skip to main content
. 2020 May 5;15(6):909–920. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02186-z

Table 2.

A comparative performance of the employed models. Average computational times for each encoder of 35 results during training and validation phases

Encoder Size (MB) Training time (s) Prediction time (s) Parameters Layers
U-NET 30 381 1.1 7,760,642 39
Modified U-NET 30 385 1.3 7,763,050 74
VGGNet 71 540 1.6 18,540,938 56
ResNet 118 446 2.3 30,546,458 223
DenseNet 51 482 3.2 12,947,674 474
Xception 103 580 1.9 26,769,602 184
MobileNet 30 385 1.5 7,590,746 129
NASNet 37 684 4.4 8,652,846 818
MobileNetV2 22 386 1.8 5,591,770 202

Best values are shown in bold