Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 16;6(3):369–377. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.05.009

Table 2.

Intergroup and intragroup comparison of the Oxford Knee Score.

Time point NMK group (n = 63)
MK group (n = 63)
Between-group comparison (n = 63)
Mean ± SD Δ = (Preoperative − follow-up)
(Mean ± SD)
P-value Mean ± SD Δ = (Preoperative − follow-up)
(Mean ± SD)
P-value Δ = (NMK − MK)
(Mean ± SE)
P-value
Preoperative 24.51 ± 6.26 - - 23.83 ± 6.48 - - 0.68 ± 1.1 .550
6 mo 33.96 ± 5.24 −9.45 ± 2.3 <.0001a 34.08 ± 5.94 −10.25 ± 3.3 <.0001a −0.12 ± 0.7 .452
12 mo 38.11 ± 5.05 −13.60 ± 3.6 <.0001a 40.08 ± 4.25 −16.25 ± 4 <.0001a −1.97 ± 0.8 .016a
24 mo 39.08 ± 4.58 −14.57 ± 3.4 <.0001a 41.40 ± 4.04 −17.57 ± 4.6 <.0001a −2.32 ± 0.8 .001a
60 mo 39.90 ± 4.13 −15.39 ± 5.2 <.0001a 41.96 ± 3.58 −18.13 ± 5 <.0001a −2.06 ± 0.7 .001a

In the NMK group, there was a significant improvement in patients’ Oxford Knee Score from preoperative to different stages of follow-up postoperatively, and a similar trend was also observed in the MK group (P-value < .05).

While comparing between the NMK and MK groups, no significant difference was observed in improvement of the OKS from preoperative to follow-up at 6 months.

Better improvement was observed in the MK group than in the NMK group at 12 months (NMK vs MK group: 38.11 ± 5.05 vs 40.08 ± 4.25), 24 months (NMK vs MK group: 39.08 ± 4.58 vs 41.40 ± 4.04), and 60 months (NMK vs MK group: 39.90 ± 4.13 vs 41.96 ± 3.58) (P-value < .05).

a

P-value < .05, statistically significant.