Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 16;6(3):369–377. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.05.009

Table 3.

Intergroup and intragroup comparison of the FJS.

Time point NMK group (n = 63)
MK group (n = 63)
Between-group comparison (n = 63)
Mean ± SD Δ = (6 Months − follow-up)
(Mean ± SD)
P-value Mean ± SD Δ = (6 Months − follow-up)
(Mean ± SD)
P-value Δ =(NMK − MK)
(Mean ± SE)
P-value
6 mo 52.43 ± 6.91 - - 52.45 ± 6.02 - - 0.02 ± 1.1 .493
12 mo 61.06 ± 6.65 −8.63 ± 3.8 <.0001a 63.75 ± 6.31 −11.30 ± 2.8 <.0001a −2.69 ± 1.1 .025a
24 mo 80.02 ± 5.75 −27.59 ± 3.4 <.0001a 82.13 ± 5.85 −29.68 ± 2.9 <.0001a −2.11 ± 1 .042a
60 mo 81.12 ± 5.17 −28.69 ± 4.2 <.0001a 85.67 ± 5.68 −33.22 ± 3.8 <.0001a −4.55 ± 0.9 <.0001a

While comparing between the NMK and MK groups, no significant difference was observed in improvement of the FJS at 6 months.

Better improvement was observed in the MK group than in the NMK group at 12 months (NMK vs MK group: 61.06 ± 6.65 vs 63.75 ± 6.31), 24 months (NMK vs MK group: 80.02 ± 5.75 vs 82.13 ± 5.85), and 60 months (NMK vs MK group: 81.12 ± 5.17 vs 85.67 ± 5.68) (P-value < .05).

a

P-value < .05, statistically significant.