Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 15;6(6):e04130. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04130

Table 5.

Composition and comparison of clusters according to the variables motor development (dimensions A and B of GMFM-88), head circumference at birth, and presence of epilepsy and dysphagia (n = 46). Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.

Variables Cluster 1 (n = 21) Cluster 2 (n = 5) Cluster 3 (n = 20) p-value
Dimension A (Lying & Rolling) 6 (3–8) 39 (38–49) 10 (5.5–14.5) <0.001a,b,c
Dimension B (Sitting) 4 (2–6) 51 (29–53) 7 (4–9.5) <0.001a,b,c
Head circumference at birth 29 (28–30) 31.5 (31–32.5) 30 (28.5–31) <0.01a,c
Epilepsy∗∗ <0.001

 Yes 21 (100%) 1 (20%) 0 (0%)
 No 0 (0%) 4 (80%) 20 (100%)

Dysphagia∗∗ <0.001

 Yes†† 21 (100%) 1 (20%) 20 (100%)
 No 0 (0%) 4 (80%) 0 (0%)

a = Cluster 1×Cluster 2.

b = Cluster 1×Cluster 3.

c = Cluster 2×Cluster 3.

Numbers indicate median and interquartile range (25 and 75).

∗∗

Numbers indicate frequency (percentage).

Out of the 24 children with epilepsy at admission to the child rehabilitation center, 2 children did not return for the GMFM-88 assessment, at 24 months.

††

Out of the 45 children with dysphagia at admission to the child rehabilitation center, 1 child had non-available information and the other 2 did not return for the GMFM-88 assessment, at 24 months.