Table 2.
Sizes of defective sub-areas. Bold value represents the size (i.e., the number of HFA sample points) per defect sub-area. Values within brackets represent the fraction of points that showed a training specific (first value) and an overall (second value) training effect.
| No. | Absolute Defect (proportion improvement) | Relative Defect (proportion improvement) | Minimal – no Defect (proportion improvement) | No. of Measurement Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 (0, 0) | 7 (0.71, 0.57) | 20 (0.45, 0.35) | 38 |
| 2 | 37 (0, 0) | 1 (0, 0) | 0 (na) | 38 |
| 3 | 16 (0,0.06) | 7 (0.29, 0.57) | 15 (0.67, 0.80) | 38 |
| 4 | 24 (0.21, 0.21) | 4 (1, 0.75) | 10 (0.30, 0.80) | 38 |
| 5 | 26 (0.12, 0.15) | 2 (1, 0) | 10 (0.10, 0.50) | 38 |
| 6 | 32 (0.03, 0.03) | 5 (0, 0) | 1 (0, 0) | 38 |
| 7 | 28 (0.07, 0.11) | 8 (0.5, 0.5) | 2 (0, 1) | 38 |
| 8 | 31 (0.10, 0.13) | 7 (0.86, 0.71) | 0 (na) | 38 |
| 9 | 37 (0, 0.30) | 1 (0, 0) | 0 (na) | 38 |
| 10 | 34 (0.06, 0.06) | 2 (0, 0) | 2 0, 0) | 38 |
| 11 | 56 (0.04, 0.09) | 8 (0.75, 0.75) | 12 (0.33, 0) | 76 |
| 12 | 6 (0.67, 0.50) | 16 (0.88, 0.75) | 16 (0.81, 0.50) | 38 |
| 13 | 11 (0.27, 0.55) | 16 (0.38, 0.56) | 11 (0.45, 0.36) | 38 |
| 14 | 0 (na) | 0 (na) | 38 (0.87, 0.87) | 38 |
| 15 | 32 (0.06, 0.06) | 0 (na) | 6 (0.17, 0) | 38 |
| 16 | 16 (0.06, 0.13) | 3 (0, 1) | 19 (0.63, 0.68) | 38 |
| 17 | 31 (0.06, 0.16) | 2 (1, 0.50) | 5 (0, 0.20) | 38 |
| 18 | 37 (0, 0) | 1 (0, 0) | 0 (na) | 38 |
| 19 | 27 (0.07, 0.04) | 2 (0.50, 0) | 9 (0.44, 0.22) | 38 |
| 20 | 18 (0.22, 0.22) | 6 (0.5, 0,50) | 14 (1, 0.71) | 38 |
| Average | 25.5 (0.11, 0.15) | 4.9 (0.46, 0.43) | 9.7 (0.39, 0.44) | na |