Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychopharmacol. 2019 Aug 13;33(9):1160–1169. doi: 10.1177/0269881119862533

Table 6.

Study 2 computer and phone-based task performance.

Placebo v. THC Fa, pb 7.5 mg v. 15 mg F, p
Computer
  Two Column Addition 14.3, 0.001**, η2c = 0.39 ns
  Simple Reaction Time 7.5, 0.012*, η2 = 0.25 7.1, 0.014*, η2 = 0.24
  Finger Tapping ns ns
  Working Memory 10.7, 0.003*, η2 = 0.32 ns
  Time Reproduction ns ns
  Time Estimation ns ns
Phone
  Paced Visual Serial Addition ns ns
  Simple Reaction Time ns ns
  Finger Tapping ns ns
  Spatial Memory ns ns
  Time Reproduction ns ns
  Time Estimation ns ns
a

F statistic and p-value from Bonferroni corrected repeated measures ANOVA with HELMERT contrasts drug condition*time interaction

b*

significant at α = 0.025,

**

significant at α = 0.0025.

c

partial eta squared