Table 6.
Study 2 computer and phone-based task performance.
Placebo v. THC Fa, pb | 7.5 mg v. 15 mg F, p | |
---|---|---|
Computer | ||
Two Column Addition | 14.3, 0.001**, η2c = 0.39 | ns |
Simple Reaction Time | 7.5, 0.012*, η2 = 0.25 | 7.1, 0.014*, η2 = 0.24 |
Finger Tapping | ns | ns |
Working Memory | 10.7, 0.003*, η2 = 0.32 | ns |
Time Reproduction | ns | ns |
Time Estimation | ns | ns |
Phone | ||
Paced Visual Serial Addition | ns | ns |
Simple Reaction Time | ns | ns |
Finger Tapping | ns | ns |
Spatial Memory | ns | ns |
Time Reproduction | ns | ns |
Time Estimation | ns | ns |
F statistic and p-value from Bonferroni corrected repeated measures ANOVA with HELMERT contrasts drug condition*time interaction
significant at α = 0.025,
significant at α = 0.0025.
partial eta squared