Skip to main content
. 2020 May 22;12139:240–254. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-50420-5_18

Table 2.

Comparison of the performance (%) of the hybrid metaheuristic over various feature selection approaches.

Approach Metric Dataset
DInline graphic DInline graphic DInline graphic
Cuckoo-Firefly-GR ACC Inline graphic Inline graphic 98.74
MCC Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
Cuckoo-GR ACC 98.47 97.11 Inline graphic
MCC 94.34 91.97 97.57
Firefly-GR ACC 97.37 97.61 92.36
MCC 92.73 93.36 94.16
Deep Autoencoders (4 Layers) ACC 89.85 95.62 83.54
MCC 57.82 87.65 65.92
Deep Autoencoders (8 Layers) ACC 87.77 95.82 82.06
MCC 47.96 88.23 62.65
LSTM Autoencoders (Compression = 0.4) ACC 89.08 92.33 77.30
MCC 53.83 78.35 50.90
LSTM Autoencoders (Compression = 0.8) ACC 88.43 67.83 77.90
MCC 50.42 39.61 51.39