. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 9.

Published in final edited form as: Organometallics. 2019 Aug 26;38(17):3377–3387. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00543

Table 2.

Comparison of Selected Bond Lengths and Angles of ^dcypfNi^II _{(2-ethylPh)(Br)} and ^dppfNi^II _{(2-ethylPh)(Br)}

complex	Ni–Br (Å)	Ni–P1, Ni–P2 (Å)	Ni–C_aryl (Å)	P1–Ni–P2 (deg)	Br–Ni–C_aryl (deg)	P1–Ni–C_aryl, P2–Ni–C_aryl (deg)
^dcypfNi^II _{(2-etliylPli)(Br)}	2.4042(11)	2.1843(19)	1.893(7)	145.00(8)	161.1(2)	92.4(2)
		2.1877(18)				92.1(2)
^dppfNi^II _{(2-ethylPh)(Br)}^a	2.320(3)	2.151(4), 2.281(4)	1.898(14)	101.63(16)	85.6(4)	83.9(4), 169.4(4)
	2.323(2)	2.133(4), 2.278(4)	1.905(14)	102.43(16)	86.1(4)	84.8(5), 169.2(4)

Data obtained from ref 13e. Two sets of geometric parameters are included because there are two independent molecules in the unit cell.