Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 19;15(6):e0234444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234444

Table 2. ANOVA results for the three measures in Study 2 of interpretations of the feedback recipient’s performance.

Internal attributions Performance quality Performance importance
F p η2 F p η2 F p η2
Role 0.27 .605 .002 14.13 < .001 .110 1.26 .264 .011
Outcomes 1.17 .281 .010 3403.5 < .001 .968 50.34 < .001 .306
Timing 0.03 .871 ~ 0 3.65 .059 .031 0.23 .636 .002
Role x Outcomes 12.43 .001 .097 0.89 .347 .008 4.28 .041 .036
Role x Timing 2.61 .109 .022 2.16 .144 .019 3.32 .071 .028
Outcomes x Timing 20.97 < .001 .153 <0.01 .951 ~ 0 1.29 .258 .011
Role x Outcomes x Timing 6.46 .012 .053 <0.01 .967 ~ 0 6.43 .013 .053

F(1, 116) for internal attributions, F(1, 114) for performance quality and importance. Underlined values are effects with p < .05 and partial η2 > .05.