Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 19.
Published in final edited form as: Top Clin Nutr. 2016 Mar;31(1):36–46. doi: 10.1097/tin.0000000000000056

Table 4.

Ordinary Least Squares Regression Model Results: Effect of Be Hipp Intervention on Absenteeism Hours(a)

Restricted
Entire Population β Populationb β
Coefficient on Coefficient on
Absenteeism Hours Absenteeism Hours
Intervention Arm (vs control arm at baseline) 1.432 (.744) −1.226 (.793)
Intervention arm in year 1c −6.632 (.114) −2.326 (.597)
Intervention arm in year 2c −6.758 (.304) −3.224 (.634)
Body mass index (at baseline) 0.886d (.002) 0.810d (.005)
Annual Income ≥$50 000 (at baseline) −8.446 (.060) −8.851 (.057)
College graduate (at baseline) −11.08d (.008) −11.58d (.008)
Observationse 789 717
a

Model controlled for age, gender, secular trend (year), baseline body mass index, annual income, and education.

b

Excluding individuals who left employment, took pregnancy leave, or had missing body mass index data.

c

Control arm and the baseline year are the referent groups.

d

P values (within parentheses) are clustered at the individual level (P < .01).

e

Observations are equal to number of participant-years.