Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 27;16(6):3641–3653. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00297

Table 2. Our Best Estimates for the Relative Isomer Energies Considered in This Worka.

system CCSD(T)/cc-pVDZ MP2/cc-pV{T,Q}Z + [CCSD(T)-MP2]/cc-pVDZ MP2-F12/cc-pVDZ-F12 + [CCSD(T)-MP2]/cc-pVDZ
24Ha 9.12 7.92 8.06
24Hb 0.00 0.00 0.00
24M 6.06 6.38 6.48
24TS1 9.05 8.93 9.01
24TS2 4.87 5.12 5.18
28H 0.00 0.00 0.00
28M –0.73 –1.77 –1.75
28M1A 0.46 0.28 0.28
28M1B 1.82 1.39 1.39
28F –0.38 0.16 –0.08
28TS1A 6.33 4.65 4.58
28TS1B 2.86 2.00 1.92
28TS2A 6.87 6.10 6.02
28TS2B 9.89 8.88 8.79
28TS3 5.17 4.50 4.36
32F 0.00 0.00 0.00
32Ma 16.81 15.45 15.65
32Mb 16.74 16.59 16.52
32H 34.60 32.59 32.72
32TS1 17.49 16.08 16.16
32TS2 33.79 32.33 32.36
a

The latter were obtained at the MP2/cc-pV{T,Q}Z + [CCSD(T)-MP2]/cc-pVDZ and MP2-F12/cc-pVDZ-F12 + [CCSD(T)-MP2]/cc-pVDZ levels of theory, with p functions on H omitted. All entries are in kcal mol–1.