Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 10;196(7):598–607. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01589-w

Table 1.

Patient characteristics by treatment regimen

Characteristics Conventional fractionation
(72–78 Gy in 2.0 Gy fractions)
Hypofractionation
(60 Gy in 3.0 Gy fractions)
No. of patients 55 55
Age, years
<65 2 (3.6) 3 (5.4)
65–74 12 (21.8) 8 (14.5)
75–79 30 (54.5) 20 (36.4)
≥80 11 (20.0) 24 (43.6)
Tumor stage
T1–T1c 44 (80.0) 45 (81.8)
T2 a–b 5 (9.1) 6 (10.9)
≥T2c 6 (10.9) 4 (7.3)
Gleason score
≤6 9 (16.4) 7 (12.7)
7 27 (49.1) 23 (41.8)
≥8 19 (34.5) 25 (45.5)
D’Amico risk classification
Low 4 (7.3) 3 (5.5)
Intermediate 28 (50.9) 27 (49.1)
High 23 (41.8) 25 (45.5)
Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)
≤3 26 (47.3) 18 (32.7)
4 15 (27.3) 14 (25.5)
5 7 (12.7) 8 (14.6)
6 3 (5.5) 8 (14.6)
≥7 4 (7.3) 7 (12.7)
ADT
Yes 25 (45.5) 31 (56.4)
No 30 (54.5) 24 (43.6)
Nicotine
Yes 3 (5.5) 10 (18.2)
Alcohol
Yes 15 (27.3) 17 (30.9)
Medication
Anticoagulants 21 (38.1) 16 (29.1)
Antiplatelet agents 13 (23.6) 20 (36.4)
Non-antithrombotic drugs 41 (74.5) 40 (72.7)

Data are given in no.; % in parenthesis. Table shows the baseline characteristics in HRT and CRT groups

ADT androgen deprivation therapy, HRT hypofractionated radiation therapy, CRT conventional radiation therapy