Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;27:102293. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102293

Table 2.

Comparison of the OR diffusion metrics between HCs and MS patients.

Diffusion MR metrics HC MS
p-value
NAWM Lesion HC vs NAWM NAWM vs Lesion
DTI
FA 0.52 (0.02) 0.49 (0.041) 0.36 (0.08) <0.001* <0.001*
MD (×10−3) 0.91 (0.04) 1.01 (0.19) 1.26 (0.19) 0.014* <0.001*
AD (×10−3) 1.50 (0.06) 1.59 (0.29) 1.76 (0.24) 0.1 0.03*
RD (×10−3) 0.61 (0.04) 0.71 (0.16) 1.00 (0.19) 0.003* <0.001*



WMTI
AWF 0.39 (0.02) 0.36 (0.03) 0.27 (0.03) <0.001* <0.001*
Da 1.05 (0.06) 1.04 (0.06) 0.99 (0.17) 0.7 0.13
De, perp 1.03 (0.05) 1.09 (0.14) 1.4 (0.28) 0.02* <0.001*
De, || 2.36 (0.09) 2.36 (0.19) 2.44 (0.38) 0.9 0.4
Tort 2.48 (0.17) 2.33 (0.21) 1.77 (0.29) 0.004* <0.001*

Note. – Diffusion metric differences between MS from HCs were assessed using Student’s t tests. Mean values are reported with standard deviations shown in parentheses.

*

Denotes significance following correction for multiple comparisons (FDR threshold of 0.05). Raw p-values are reported in the table.