Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 10;15(2):153–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.03.004

Figure 8.

Figure 8

A. Sensitivity using the three modalities by the two examiners in diagnosing different TMJ osseous degenerative features. The dotted line indicates the acceptable 70% for sensitivity. B. Comparison of the sensitivities for identification of TMJ osseous degenerative features using the three modalities by the two examiners. There was a significantly higher sensitivity using CBCT than using TMJQR (∗p < .05, post-hoc analysis, Bonferronitest) and a nearly significant difference between CBCT and PANO.